↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL022-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:57:46 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 5.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   30 (  16   ~;  14   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   70 (   0 sgn   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(VAR_1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(VAR_0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

fof(yql,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1),equivalent(equivalent(VAR_2,VAR_1),equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_2)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',yql) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(C,B),equivalent(A,C)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[yql]) ).

fof(prove_ec_1,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(b,c))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_ec_1) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(b,c))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_ec_1]) ).

cnf(c_371,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(C,B),equivalent(A,C)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(D,B))),equivalent(equivalent(D,C),A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_371,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_372,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(D,C),A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(D,B)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(equivalent(D,B),equivalent(C,D))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_372,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_373,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(D,C),A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(D,B)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_373,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_374,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(C,B),equivalent(A,C)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(B,C)),equivalent(equivalent(B,C),A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_374,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_375,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(D,C),A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(D,B)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(C,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_375,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_376,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(D,C),A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(D,B)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,A),equivalent(B,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_376,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_377,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(B,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_377,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_378,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(C,B)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_378,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_379,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(equivalent(D,B),equivalent(C,D))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(C,A),equivalent(B,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_379,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_380,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(B,A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_25]) ).

cnf(c_369,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(C,A)),equivalent(B,C))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_380,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_370,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_369,c_3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL022-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/5.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:49:20 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/5.36  % Process 3373122 was started by sandbox2 on n016,
% 0.09/5.36  % Fri Sep 25 21:49:20 2026
% 0.09/5.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/5.37  
% 0.09/5.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/5.39  
% 0.09/5.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.09/5.39  
% 0.09/5.39  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.09/5.39  % Length of proof is 14.
% 0.09/5.39  % Level of proof is 9.
% 0.09/5.39  % Maximum clause weight is 53.000.
% 0.09/5.39  % Given clauses 33.
% 0.09/5.39  
% 0.09/5.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------