↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL022-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0kJTTOHA66 true

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:35:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL022-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0kJTTOHA66 true
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 23:33:42 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.37  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.08/0.37  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.37  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.08/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.08/0.38  % Running in FO mode
% 0.42/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.42/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.42/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.46/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.47/0.80  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.47/0.80  % BCE start: 3
% 0.47/0.80  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.47/0.80  % PE start: 3
% 0.47/0.80  logic: neq
% 0.47/0.80  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.47/0.80  % done 22 iterations in 0.037s
% 0.47/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.47/0.80  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.47/0.80  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(equivalent_type, type, equivalent: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(yql, axiom,
% 0.47/0.80    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.47/0.80     ( equivalent @
% 0.47/0.80       ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) @ 
% 0.47/0.80       ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ Z @ Y ) @ ( equivalent @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 0.47/0.80            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [yql])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.47/0.80    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.47/0.80     ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.47/0.80          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 0.47/0.80            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [yql])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 0.47/0.80            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [yql])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.47/0.80          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.47/0.80          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         ( (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X1))
% 0.47/0.80          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('eq_fact', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.47/0.80          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80           (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/0.80            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)) @ 
% 0.47/0.80            (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.47/0.80          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X3 @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80              (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/0.80               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.47/0.80               X3)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(prove_ec_1, conjecture,
% 0.47/0.80    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.47/0.80     ( equivalent @
% 0.47/0.80       ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ a @ b ) @ ( equivalent @ c @ a ) ) @ 
% 0.47/0.80       ( equivalent @ b @ c ) ))).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.47/0.80    (~( is_a_theorem @
% 0.47/0.80        ( equivalent @
% 0.47/0.80          ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ a @ b ) @ ( equivalent @ c @ a ) ) @ 
% 0.47/0.80          ( equivalent @ b @ c ) ) )),
% 0.47/0.80    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_ec_1])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80          (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/0.80           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ b) @ (equivalent @ c @ a)) @ 
% 0.47/0.80           (equivalent @ b @ c)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl70, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80          (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ c) @ (equivalent @ c @ b)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl23, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl73, plain, (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ c @ c))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl70])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80           (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/0.80            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)) @ 
% 0.47/0.80            (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.47/0.80          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i]:  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl74, plain, ($false),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl73, zip_derived_cl33])).
% 0.47/0.80  
% 0.47/0.80  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.47/0.80  
% 0.47/0.80  
% 0.47/0.80  % Terminating...
% 0.47/0.86  % Runner terminated.
% 0.47/0.87  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------