↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL026-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:05:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 19.09s 3.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 19.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   62 (  33 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  164 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   80 (  43   ~;  37   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   78 (   0 sgn  78   !;   0   ?;  70   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c0_2) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,falsehood),falsehood),X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c0_5) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X0,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c0_6) ).

fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_c0_3) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,falsehood),falsehood),X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X0,X2)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_76,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = implies(a,b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_77,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = implies(iPr_def_10,a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_78,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = implies(iPr_def_11,a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_76,c_77,c_78]) ).

tcf(c_176,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_196,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_11),implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_10),implies(X0,a)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_197,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_12),implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_11),implies(X0,a)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_198,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,implies(b,X0)),implies(iPr_def_10,implies(a,X0)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_199,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_10,implies(a,X0)),implies(iPr_def_11,implies(iPr_def_10,X0)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_201,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,implies(X0,b)),implies(implies(a,X0),iPr_def_10))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_203,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_11,implies(X0,a)),implies(implies(iPr_def_11,X0),iPr_def_12))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_204,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X0,X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_307,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_11),implies(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_12))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_196]) ).

tcf(c_322,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_12))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_11)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_307,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_380,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_11),implies(X0,a)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,iPr_def_12)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_197,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_434,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_10,implies(a,X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,implies(b,X0))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_449,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_10,implies(a,a)),implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_11))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_199]) ).

tcf(c_454,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_11))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_10,implies(a,a))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_449,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_530,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,X0),iPr_def_10))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,implies(X0,b))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_201,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_544,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_11,X0),iPr_def_12))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,implies(X0,a))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_203,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_611,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_677,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_10,implies(a,a))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_434]) ).

tcf(c_681,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_11)),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_454,c_677]) ).

tcf(c_684,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_12)),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_681]) ).

tcf(c_893,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_11,X0),iPr_def_12))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,a)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_176,c_544]) ).

tcf(c_956,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(iPr_def_12)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,a)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_893,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_957,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,a)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_956,c_79]) ).

tcf(c_1016,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X0,X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_611]) ).

tcf(c_1017,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_176,c_611]) ).

tcf(c_1966,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X2,X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_1017]) ).

tcf(c_1967,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(X1,falsehood),falsehood))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_1017]) ).

tcf(c_1968,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X1,X3))))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_1017]) ).

tcf(c_1993,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,iPr_def_12))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_684,c_1017]) ).

tcf(c_1996,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,a)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,iPr_def_12))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,iPr_def_11))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_380,c_1017]) ).

tcf(c_2600,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1966,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_2812,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,falsehood),falsehood)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_2600]) ).

tcf(c_3463,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(falsehood,falsehood))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_2812]) ).

tcf(c_3488,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(falsehood,implies(falsehood,X0)),implies(falsehood,X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3463,c_1016]) ).

tcf(c_3519,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_1967]) ).

tcf(c_5010,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X1,X3)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1968,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_5084,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X0),implies(implies(X0,X1),X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_5010]) ).

tcf(c_6833,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,falsehood),X0),X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(falsehood,falsehood))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5084,c_1967]) ).

tcf(c_6838,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,falsehood),X0),X0)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6833,c_3463]) ).

tcf(c_7044,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,implies(implies(a,falsehood),a))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6838,c_957]) ).

tcf(c_7708,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(falsehood,X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,implies(falsehood,X0))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3488,c_2600]) ).

tcf(c_7717,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(falsehood,X1))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_7708,c_3519]) ).

tcf(c_7735,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,falsehood),iPr_def_10)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7717,c_530]) ).

tcf(c_9173,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,iPr_def_12))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,iPr_def_10)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1966,c_1993]) ).

tcf(c_9308,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,falsehood),iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7735,c_9173]) ).

tcf(c_39355,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,implies(X0,a)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,iPr_def_12)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_1996]) ).

tcf(c_39846,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,falsehood),iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_39355,c_7044]) ).

tcf(c_39857,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_39846,c_9308]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL026-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 21:39:00 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.46  % Proving...
% 19.09/3.44  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 19.09/3.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % ------  iProver source info
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 19.09/3.44  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 19.09/3.44  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ Proving...
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % 
% 19.09/3.44  % clauses                               8
% 19.09/3.44  % conjectures                           1
% 19.09/3.44  % EPR                                   1
% 19.09/3.44  % Horn                                  8
% 19.09/3.44  % unary                                 7
% 19.09/3.44  % binary                                0
% 19.09/3.44  % lits                                  10
% 19.09/3.44  % lits eq                               3
% 19.09/3.44  % fd_pure                               0
% 19.09/3.44  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 19.09/3.44  % fd_cond                               0
% 19.09/3.44  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 19.09/3.44  % AC symbols                            0
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ 
% 19.09/3.44  % Current options:
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ 
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % 
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % ------ Proving...
% 19.09/3.44  % 
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 19.09/3.44  
% 19.09/3.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------