↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:57:47 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   9   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   4 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(VAR_1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(VAR_0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

fof(c0_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : is_a_theorem(implies(VAR_0,implies(VAR_1,VAR_0))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',c0_2) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[c0_2]) ).

fof(c0_5,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(VAR_0,falsehood),falsehood),VAR_0)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',c0_5) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,falsehood),falsehood),A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[c0_5]) ).

fof(c0_6,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(VAR_0,implies(VAR_1,VAR_2)),implies(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1),implies(VAR_0,VAR_2)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',c0_6) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(A,B),implies(A,C)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[c0_6]) ).

fof(prove_c0_4,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,a)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_c0_4) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,a)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_c0_4]) ).

cnf(c_102,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(B,A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(B,falsehood),falsehood),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_103,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(A,C)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,C))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(implies(B,falsehood),falsehood)),implies(A,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_104,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,falsehood),falsehood))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_100,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_101,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_5]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:46:50 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.36  % Process 2918027 was started by sandbox2 on n018,
% 0.09/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 21:46:50 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.37  
% 0.09/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.09/0.40  % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.09/0.40  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.09/0.40  % Maximum clause weight is 37.000.
% 0.09/0.40  % Given clauses 25.
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------