↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Cxdgve91Yc true

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:35:03 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.79s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Cxdgve91Yc true
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 17:12:46 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.37  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.38  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.38  % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.10/0.38  % Running in FO mode
% 0.44/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.44/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.44/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.47/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.47/0.79  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.47/0.79  % BCE start: 5
% 0.47/0.79  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.47/0.79  % PE start: 5
% 0.47/0.79  logic: neq
% 0.47/0.79  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.47/0.79  % done 54 iterations in 0.035s
% 0.47/0.79  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.47/0.79  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.47/0.79  thf(falsehood_type, type, falsehood: $i).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(prove_c0_4, conjecture, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ falsehood @ a ))).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.47/0.79    (~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ falsehood @ a ) )),
% 0.47/0.79    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_c0_4])).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ falsehood @ a))),
% 0.47/0.79      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(c0_5, axiom,
% 0.47/0.79    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.47/0.79     ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ falsehood ) @ falsehood ) @ X ))).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.47/0.79      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.79          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.79           (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ falsehood) @ falsehood) @ X0))),
% 0.47/0.79      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [c0_5])).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(c0_2, axiom, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ))).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.47/0.79      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.79          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.47/0.79      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [c0_2])).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.47/0.79    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | 
% 0.47/0.79     ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.47/0.79      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.79         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.47/0.79          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.47/0.79          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.47/0.79      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.47/0.79      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.79         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0) |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.47/0.79      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.47/0.79      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.79          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.47/0.79      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [c0_2])).
% 0.47/0.79  thf(c0_6, axiom,
% 0.47/0.80    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.47/0.80     ( implies @
% 0.47/0.80       ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) ) @ 
% 0.47/0.80       ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.47/0.80            (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [c0_6])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.47/0.80          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80              (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.47/0.80          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 0.47/0.80          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/0.80             (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl51, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.47/0.80         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 0.47/0.80          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl151, plain,
% 0.47/0.80      (![X0 : $i]:  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ falsehood @ X0))),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl51])).
% 0.47/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl159, plain, ($false),
% 0.47/0.80      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl151])).
% 0.47/0.80  
% 0.47/0.80  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.47/0.80  
% 0.47/0.80  
% 0.48/0.80  % Terminating...
% 0.48/0.84  % Runner terminated.
% 0.48/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------