↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL030-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:18:17 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 155.00s 23.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 155.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  19 unt;   0 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   63 (   0 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   88 (  12 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(c0_1,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c0_1) ).

cnf(c0_3,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c0_3) ).

cnf(c0_2,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c0_2) ).

cnf(prove_c0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,implies(b,c)),implies(implies(a,b),implies(a,c)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_c0_6) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    c0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X2,X4),implies(X1,X4)),X3))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1),X1)),
    c0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    c0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X1),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X4,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X2),X3))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1),implies(implies(X1,X2),X2))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,X3),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),X2))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,implies(b,c)),implies(implies(a,b),implies(a,c)))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_c0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X3),implies(X4,X3)),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),X3),X1),X1)),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,implies(b,c)),implies(implies(a,b),implies(a,c)))),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),X2),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X4))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X4,X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,implies(b,c)),X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(a,b),implies(a,c)))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X1,X3))),implies(X2,implies(X1,X3)))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(implies(X3,X5),implies(X2,X5)),X4)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,X3),X4))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,implies(b,c)),implies(a,implies(implies(a,b),implies(a,c))))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X3,X1),implies(X3,X2)))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL030-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:00:49 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 155.00/23.05  % Version: 3.5.1
% 155.00/23.05  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 155.00/23.05  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2719166 completed with status 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 155.00/23.05  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 155.00/23.05  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 155.00/23.05  % No SInE strategy applied
% 155.00/23.05  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 155.00/23.05  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S00 with 136s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % G-E--_300_C01_S00 with pid 2719173 completed with status 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Result found by G-E--_300_C01_S00
% 155.00/23.05  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 155.00/23.05  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 155.00/23.05  % No SInE strategy applied
% 155.00/23.05  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 155.00/23.05  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S00 with 136s (1) cores
% 155.00/23.05  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 155.00/23.05  
% 155.00/23.05  % Proof found!
% 155.00/23.05  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 155.00/23.05  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 155.00/23.05  % Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 155.00/23.05  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Initial clauses                      : 6
% 155.00/23.05  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 155.00/23.05  % Processed clauses                    : 27844
% 155.00/23.05  % ...of these trivial                  : 241
% 155.00/23.05  % ...subsumed                          : 25382
% 155.00/23.05  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2221
% 155.00/23.05  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Backward-subsumed                    : 94
% 155.00/23.05  % Backward-rewritten                   : 31
% 155.00/23.05  % Generated clauses                    : 1209169
% 155.00/23.05  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1155326
% 155.00/23.05  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Paramodulations                      : 1209169
% 155.00/23.05  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % NegExts                              : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Total rewrite steps                  : 66261
% 155.00/23.05  % ...of those cached                   : 58399
% 155.00/23.05  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 155.00/23.05  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 155.00/23.05  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 155.00/23.05  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 155.00/23.05  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 155.00/23.05  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 155.00/23.05  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 155.00/23.05  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 155.00/23.05  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 155.00/23.05  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 155.00/23.05  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 155.00/23.05  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 155.00/23.05  % Current number of processed clauses  : 2096
% 155.00/23.05  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 415
% 155.00/23.05  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 155.00/23.05  %    Negative unit clauses             : 547
% 155.00/23.05  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1134
% 155.00/23.05  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1126877
% 155.00/23.05  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4022106
% 155.00/23.05  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Current number of archived clauses   : 125
% 155.00/23.05  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 190081
% 155.00/23.05  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 128240
% 155.00/23.05  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8643
% 155.00/23.05  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 49856
% 155.00/23.05  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 167282
% 155.00/23.05  % BW rewrite match successes           : 31
% 155.00/23.05  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 155.00/23.05  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 14813426
% 155.00/23.05  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 8
% 155.00/23.05  
% 155.00/23.05  % -------------------------------------------------
% 155.00/23.05  % User time                : 21.121 s
% 155.00/23.05  % System time              : 0.807 s
% 155.00/23.05  % Total time               : 21.929 s
% 155.00/23.05  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 155.00/23.05  
% 155.00/23.05  % -------------------------------------------------
% 155.00/23.05  % User time                : 106.113 s
% 155.00/23.05  % System time              : 3.749 s
% 155.00/23.05  % Total time               : 109.863 s
% 155.00/23.05  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 155.00/23.05  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------