%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL035-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8mHqxTryQs true
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 01:35:04 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.78s
% Output : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL035-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8mHqxTryQs true
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Sat Sep 5 06:08:58 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.37 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.38 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.11/0.38 % Running in FO mode
% 0.45/0.67 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.45/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.45/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.49/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.49/0.78 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.49/0.78 % BCE start: 3
% 0.49/0.78 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.49/0.78 % PE start: 3
% 0.49/0.78 logic: neq
% 0.49/0.78 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.49/0.78 % done 28 iterations in 0.021s
% 0.49/0.78 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.49/0.78 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.49/0.78 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(falsehood_type, type, falsehood: $i).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(prove_c0_4, conjecture, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ falsehood @ a ))).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.49/0.78 (~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ falsehood @ a ) )),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_c0_4])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ falsehood @ a))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(c0_CAMeredith, axiom,
% 0.49/0.78 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 ( implies @
% 0.49/0.78 ( implies @
% 0.49/0.78 ( implies @
% 0.49/0.78 ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ ( implies @ Z @ falsehood ) ) @ U ) @
% 0.49/0.78 V ) @
% 0.49/0.78 ( implies @ ( implies @ V @ X ) @ ( implies @ Z @ X ) ) ))).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ (implies @ X2 @ falsehood)) @ X3) @
% 0.49/0.78 X4) @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X4 @ X0) @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [c0_CAMeredith])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ (implies @ X2 @ falsehood)) @ X3) @
% 0.49/0.78 X4) @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X4 @ X0) @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [c0_CAMeredith])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.49/0.78 (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) |
% 0.49/0.78 ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.49/0.78 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.49/0.78 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X4) @ (implies @ X1 @ falsehood)) @
% 0.49/0.78 X3) @
% 0.49/0.78 X2))
% 0.49/0.78 | (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ X0 @ X4)) @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ X0 @ X4))))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ X0 @ X4)) @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ X0 @ X4))))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X4) @ (implies @ X1 @ falsehood)) @
% 0.49/0.78 X3) @
% 0.49/0.78 X2))
% 0.49/0.78 | (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ falsehood @ X0)) @ X3) @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ X2 @ X3)))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.49/0.78 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.49/0.78 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ falsehood @ X2)) @ X0))
% 0.49/0.78 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ X4 @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ falsehood @ X0))))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.49/0.78 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.49/0.78 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X2)
% 0.49/0.78 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ falsehood @ X0))))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ (implies @ X2 @ falsehood)) @ X3) @
% 0.49/0.78 X4) @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X4 @ X0) @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [c0_CAMeredith])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ falsehood @ X2)) @ X0))
% 0.49/0.78 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ X5 @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ falsehood @ X2) @ X0) @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl40, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X5 @ (implies @ falsehood @ X4)))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.49/0.78 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.49/0.78 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl64, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X1) | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ falsehood @ X0)))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl40, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.78 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ X5 @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ falsehood @ X2) @ X0) @
% 0.49/0.78 (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl69, plain,
% 0.49/0.78 (![X4 : $i]: (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ falsehood @ X4))),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl64, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 0.49/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl90, plain, ($false),
% 0.49/0.78 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl69])).
% 0.49/0.78
% 0.49/0.78 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.49/0.78
% 0.49/0.78
% 0.49/0.78 % Terminating...
% 1.40/0.81 % Runner terminated.
% 1.40/0.84 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------