↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL039-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:05:29 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.61s 1.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   68 (  25 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  124 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  115 (  59   ~;  56   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  123 (   0 sgn 123   !;   0   ?; 110   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_18) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X0,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_35) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X0),not(X1)),implies(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_49) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(implies(X0,X1)),implies(necessary(X0),necessary(X1)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',necessitation1) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(X0),X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',necessitation2) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_of_necessitation) ).

fof(f8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(a),not(necessary(not(a))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

tcf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(a),not(necessary(not(a))))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X0,X2)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X0),not(X1)),implies(X1,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(X0),X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(implies(X0,X1)),implies(necessary(X0),necessary(X1)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_183,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_184,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_246,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X0,X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_250,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X0,X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_270,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_315,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(X0),necessary(X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_345,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_315,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_471,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_345]) ).

tcf(c_520,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(implies(X1,X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_471]) ).

tcf(c_522,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(implies(X1,X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(implies(not(X0),not(X1)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_471]) ).

tcf(c_523,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(implies(necessary(X0),necessary(X1))))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(implies(X0,X1)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_471]) ).

tcf(c_526,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_315,c_471]) ).

tcf(c_642,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_520,c_184]) ).

tcf(c_728,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_740,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_250,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_763,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(implies(X1,X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_522]) ).

tcf(c_864,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(X0),necessary(X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(implies(X0,X1)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_523,c_184]) ).

tcf(c_878,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_728]) ).

tcf(c_915,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_740]) ).

tcf(c_916,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X0,X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_740]) ).

tcf(c_919,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(implies(X0,X1)),X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(implies(X0,X1)),X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_740]) ).

tcf(c_921,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_183,c_740]) ).

tcf(c_1058,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_878]) ).

tcf(c_1068,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X0)),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_915,c_1058]) ).

tcf(c_1073,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(necessary(implies(X0,X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1068,c_763]) ).

tcf(c_1515,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(implies(X0,X1)),X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_642,c_919]) ).

tcf(c_2209,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1515,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_2613,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_526]) ).

tcf(c_3416,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_2209]) ).

tcf(c_3557,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(X0))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_3416]) ).

tcf(c_4291,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(implies(X1,X0))))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(X0))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_2613]) ).

tcf(c_4293,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(implies(X1,X0))))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(implies(not(X0),not(X1))))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_2613]) ).

tcf(c_4297,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(X0))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_183,c_2613]) ).

tcf(c_4464,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(X0))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4291,c_3557]) ).

tcf(c_5021,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_4297]) ).

tcf(c_5044,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1073,c_5021]) ).

tcf(c_5089,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(X0),necessary(X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5044,c_864]) ).

tcf(c_5106,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(implies(X1,X0))))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessary(implies(not(X0),not(X1)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_4293]) ).

tcf(c_5186,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(necessary(necessary(implies(X0,X0)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1073,c_5106]) ).

tcf(c_5426,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5186,c_4464]) ).

tcf(c_5438,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5426,c_916]) ).

tcf(c_5626,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5438,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_9409,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X2,X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X1),not(X2)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_921]) ).

tcf(c_9411,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,necessary(X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_921]) ).

tcf(c_10477,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(X0),X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5089,c_9411]) ).

tcf(c_13073,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,not(necessary(not(a))))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_10477,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_16767,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),implies(X0,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_9409]) ).

tcf(c_17320,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X0)),implies(X1,X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_16767,c_9409]) ).

tcf(c_17578,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X0)),X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_17320,c_5626]) ).

tcf(c_18309,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(necessary(X0))),X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_17578,c_9411]) ).

tcf(c_18894,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,not(necessary(not(X0))))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_18309,c_270]) ).

tcf(c_18918,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_13073,c_18894]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LCL039-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 21:41:36 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.30  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.32  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.03/0.32  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.33  
% 0.03/0.33  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.03/0.33  
% 0.03/0.33  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.07/0.33  % Proving...
% 7.61/1.50  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.61/1.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % ------  iProver source info
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 7.61/1.50  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 7.61/1.50  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ Proving...
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % 
% 7.61/1.50  % clauses                               8
% 7.61/1.50  % conjectures                           1
% 7.61/1.50  % EPR                                   0
% 7.61/1.50  % Horn                                  8
% 7.61/1.50  % unary                                 6
% 7.61/1.50  % binary                                1
% 7.61/1.50  % lits                                  11
% 7.61/1.50  % lits eq                               0
% 7.61/1.50  % fd_pure                               0
% 7.61/1.50  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 7.61/1.50  % fd_cond                               0
% 7.61/1.50  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 7.61/1.50  % AC symbols                            0
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ 
% 7.61/1.50  % Current options:
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ 
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % 
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % ------ Proving...
% 7.61/1.50  % 
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.61/1.50  
% 7.61/1.50  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------