↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : LCL044-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:18:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.25s 0.54s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : LCL044-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat Sep  5 05:17:21 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.25/0.52  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.25/0.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.53  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.25/0.53  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.25/0.53  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.25/0.53  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.25/0.53  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.25/0.53  
% 0.25/0.53  % Result      :Theorem 0.027660s
% 0.25/0.53  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.027660s
% 0.25/0.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.53  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.53  % File     : LCL044-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.25/0.53  % Domain   : Logic Calculi (Implication/Negation 2 valued sentential)
% 0.25/0.53  % Problem  : CN-40 depends on Hilbert's system
% 0.25/0.53  % Version  : [McC92] axioms.
% 0.25/0.53  % English  : Two axiomatisations of the Implication/Negation 2 valued
% 0.25/0.53  %            sentential calculus are {CN-18,CN-21,CN-35,CN-39,CN-39,
% 0.25/0.53  %            CN-40,CN-46} by Frege and {CN-3,CN-18,CN-21,CN-22,CN-30,
% 0.25/0.53  %            CN-54} by Hilbert. Show that CN-40 depends on the simplified
% 0.25/0.53  %            Hilbert system (without CN-30).
% 0.25/0.53  
% 0.25/0.54  % Refs     : [MW92]  McCune & Wos (1992), Experiments in Automated Deductio
% 0.25/0.54  %          : [McC92] McCune (1992), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.25/0.54  % Source   : [McC92]
% 0.25/0.54  % Names    : CN-5 [MW92]
% 0.25/0.54  
% 0.25/0.54  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.25/0.54  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.1.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.25/0.54  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   2 RR)
% 0.25/0.54  %            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
% 0.25/0.54  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.25/0.54  %            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
% 0.25/0.54  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.25/0.54  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.25/0.54  %            Number of variables   :   14 (   2 sgn)
% 0.25/0.54  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.25/0.54  
% 0.25/0.54  % Comments :
% 0.25/0.54  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
% 0.25/0.54      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
% 0.25/0.54      | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
% 0.25/0.54      | is_a_theorem(Y) ) ).
% 0.25/0.54  
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(cn_3,axiom,
% 0.25/0.54      is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(not(X),Y))) ).
% 0.25/0.54  
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(cn_18,axiom,
% 0.25/0.54      is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ).
% 0.25/0.54  
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(cn_21,axiom,
% 0.25/0.54      is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(Y,implies(X,Z)))) ).
% 0.25/0.54  
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(cn_22,axiom,
% 0.25/0.54      is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z)))) ).
% 0.25/0.54  
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(cn_54,axiom,
% 0.25/0.54      is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(not(X),Y),Y))) ).
% 0.25/0.54  
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(prove_cn_40,negated_conjecture,
% 0.25/0.54      ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,not(not(a)))) ).
% 0.25/0.54  
% 0.25/0.54  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.54  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.54  % Proof found
% 0.25/0.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.25/0.54  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.25/0.54  %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.25/0.54  %VarNum:27(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 0.25/0.54  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.25/0.54  %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 0.25/0.54  %SharedTerms:5
% 0.25/0.54  %goalClause: 6
% 0.25/0.54  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.25/0.54  [6]~P1(f1(a2,f3(f3(a2))))
% 0.25/0.54  [1]P1(f1(x11,f1(x12,x11)))
% 0.25/0.54  [2]P1(f1(x21,f1(f3(x21),x22)))
% 0.25/0.54  [3]P1(f1(f1(x31,x32),f1(f1(f3(x31),x32),x32)))
% 0.25/0.54  [4]P1(f1(f1(x41,x42),f1(f1(x43,x41),f1(x43,x42))))
% 0.25/0.54  [5]P1(f1(f1(x51,f1(x52,x53)),f1(x52,f1(x51,x53))))
% 0.25/0.54  [7]P1(x71)+~P1(x72)+~P1(f1(x72,x71))
% 0.25/0.54  %EqnAxiom
% 0.25/0.54  
% 0.25/0.54  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(11,plain,
% 0.25/0.54     (P1(f1(f1(x111,x112),f1(f1(x112,x113),f1(x111,x113))))),
% 0.25/0.54     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,5,7])).
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(14,plain,
% 0.25/0.54     (P1(f1(f1(f1(f3(x141),x142),x143),f1(x141,x143)))),
% 0.25/0.54     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,2,7])).
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.25/0.54     (~P1(f1(f1(f3(a2),x171),f3(f3(a2))))),
% 0.25/0.54     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,14,7])).
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(38,plain,
% 0.25/0.54     (P1(f1(x381,f1(x382,x382)))),
% 0.25/0.54     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,7])).
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(41,plain,
% 0.25/0.54     (P1(f1(x411,x411))),
% 0.25/0.54     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,38,7])).
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(74,plain,
% 0.25/0.54     (P1(f1(f1(f3(x741),x742),f1(f1(x741,x742),x742)))),
% 0.25/0.54     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,5,7])).
% 0.25/0.54  cnf(77,plain,
% 0.25/0.54     ($false),
% 0.25/0.54     inference(scs_inference,[],[74,41,17,7]),
% 0.25/0.54     ['proof']).
% 0.25/0.54  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.25/0.54  % Total time :0.027660s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------