↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL064-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ihPNgNtfi8 true

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:35:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.50s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 0.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL064-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ihPNgNtfi8 true
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 22:29:10 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.10/0.37  % Running in FO mode
% 0.47/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.47/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.47/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.50/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/0.78  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.50/0.78  % BCE start: 4
% 0.50/0.78  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.50/0.78  % PE start: 4
% 0.50/0.78  logic: neq
% 0.50/0.78  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.50/0.78  % done 45 iterations in 0.032s
% 0.50/0.78  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.50/0.78  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.50/0.78  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(prove_cn_1, conjecture,
% 0.50/0.78    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.50/0.78     ( implies @
% 0.50/0.78       ( implies @ a @ b ) @ 
% 0.50/0.78       ( implies @ ( implies @ b @ c ) @ ( implies @ a @ c ) ) ))).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.50/0.78    (~( is_a_theorem @
% 0.50/0.78        ( implies @
% 0.50/0.78          ( implies @ a @ b ) @ 
% 0.50/0.78          ( implies @ ( implies @ b @ c ) @ ( implies @ a @ c ) ) ) )),
% 0.50/0.78    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_cn_1])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.50/0.78          (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ 
% 0.50/0.78           (implies @ (implies @ b @ c) @ (implies @ a @ c))))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(cn_35, axiom,
% 0.50/0.78    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.50/0.78     ( implies @
% 0.50/0.78       ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) ) @ 
% 0.50/0.78       ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.50/0.78           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.50/0.78            (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_35])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(cn_18, axiom, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ))).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_18])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.50/0.78    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | 
% 0.50/0.78     ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.50/0.78          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.50/0.78          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0) |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_18])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.50/0.78           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.50/0.78            (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_35])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.50/0.78          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.50/0.78          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 0.50/0.78          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.50/0.78              (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.50/0.78          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.50/0.78          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 0.50/0.78          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.50/0.78          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.50/0.78             (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))
% 0.50/0.78          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 0.50/0.78          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.50/0.78           (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ 
% 0.50/0.78            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl15])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 0.50/0.78          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.50/0.78              (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 0.50/0.78          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 0.50/0.78          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl15])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl116, plain,
% 0.50/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.50/0.78          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.50/0.78           (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ 
% 0.50/0.78            (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl28, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 0.50/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl118, plain, ($false),
% 0.50/0.78      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl116])).
% 0.50/0.78  
% 0.50/0.78  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.50/0.78  
% 0.50/0.78  
% 0.50/0.78  % Terminating...
% 1.49/0.83  % Runner terminated.
% 1.49/0.84  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------