↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL068-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:18:23 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.26s 1.14s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   43 (  21 unt;   0 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   75 (   0 equ;  37 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   93 (  22 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(cn_59,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),implies(implies(X3,X2),implies(implies(X1,X3),X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_59) ).

cnf(cn_37,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(not(X1),X3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_37) ).

cnf(cn_19,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_19) ).

cnf(prove_cn_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),a),a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_2) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),implies(implies(X3,X2),implies(implies(X1,X3),X2)))),
    cn_59 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X3),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X3,X1),X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(not(X1),X3))),
    cn_37 ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X3))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X3),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3))),
    cn_19 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),implies(X2,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X4,implies(X1,X2)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X1),X4))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X1),implies(X1,X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(X1,X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X1),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X1),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_23]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),implies(not(X1),X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(X1,not(X2))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,implies(X1,not(X2))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(implies(X2,X1)),X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),a),a)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_cn_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),not(X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),a),a)),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),X3))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,a))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),implies(X1,X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X1)),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL068-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.47  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.47  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.47  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.47  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.47  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.47  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.47  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.47  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:03:35 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.47  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.55  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.55  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.26/1.14  % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.26/1.14  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.26/1.14  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1828802 completed with status 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 3.26/1.14  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.26/1.14  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.26/1.14  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.26/1.14  % Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 3.26/1.14  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with pid 1828812 completed with status 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Result found by H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V
% 3.26/1.14  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.26/1.14  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.26/1.14  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.26/1.14  % Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 3.26/1.14  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/1.14  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 3.26/1.14  
% 3.26/1.14  % Proof found!
% 3.26/1.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.26/1.14  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.26/1.14  % Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 3.26/1.14  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Initial clauses                      : 5
% 3.26/1.14  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 3.26/1.14  % Processed clauses                    : 5057
% 3.26/1.14  % ...of these trivial                  : 112
% 3.26/1.14  % ...subsumed                          : 4059
% 3.26/1.14  % ...remaining for further processing  : 886
% 3.26/1.14  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Backward-subsumed                    : 57
% 3.26/1.14  % Backward-rewritten                   : 13
% 3.26/1.14  % Generated clauses                    : 34202
% 3.26/1.14  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31582
% 3.26/1.14  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Paramodulations                      : 34202
% 3.26/1.14  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2828
% 3.26/1.14  % ...of those cached                   : 2173
% 3.26/1.14  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.26/1.14  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.26/1.14  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.26/1.14  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.26/1.14  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.26/1.14  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.26/1.14  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.26/1.14  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.26/1.14  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.26/1.14  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.26/1.14  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.26/1.14  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.26/1.14  % Current number of processed clauses  : 816
% 3.26/1.14  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 244
% 3.26/1.14  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.26/1.14  %    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 3.26/1.14  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 563
% 3.26/1.14  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25952
% 3.26/1.14  % ...number of literals in the above   : 75004
% 3.26/1.14  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Current number of archived clauses   : 70
% 3.26/1.14  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 83098
% 3.26/1.14  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 78473
% 3.26/1.14  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4066
% 3.26/1.14  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2246
% 3.26/1.14  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 14255
% 3.26/1.14  % BW rewrite match successes           : 16
% 3.26/1.14  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.26/1.14  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 498313
% 3.26/1.14  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 8
% 3.26/1.14  
% 3.26/1.14  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.26/1.14  % User time                : 0.466 s
% 3.26/1.14  % System time              : 0.025 s
% 3.26/1.14  % Total time               : 0.491 s
% 3.26/1.14  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 3.26/1.14  
% 3.26/1.14  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.26/1.14  % User time                : 2.329 s
% 3.26/1.14  % System time              : 0.110 s
% 3.26/1.14  % Total time               : 2.439 s
% 3.26/1.14  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 3.26/1.14  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------