%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : LCL070-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:05:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 33.46s 6.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 33.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 16
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 83 ( 56 unt; 5 def)
% Number of atoms : 215 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 79 ( 42 ~; 37 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 6 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 143 ( 0 sgn 143 !; 0 ?; 131 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),implies(X1,X2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_19) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),implies(not(X0),X2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_37) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(not(X1),X2)),implies(X0,implies(implies(X3,X2),implies(implies(X1,X3),X2))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_60) ).
fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,b),implies(implies(b,c),implies(a,c)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_1) ).
tcf(c_54,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_55,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),implies(X1,X2))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),implies(not(X0),X2))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_57,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(not(X1),X2)),implies(X0,implies(implies(X3,X2),implies(implies(X1,X3),X2))))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,b),implies(implies(b,c),implies(a,c)))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
tcf(c_76,definition,
iPr_def_10 = implies(a,b),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_77,definition,
iPr_def_11 = implies(b,c),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_78,definition,
iPr_def_12 = implies(a,c),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_79,definition,
iPr_def_13 = implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_80,definition,
iPr_def_14 = implies(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).
tcf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(iPr_def_14),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_78,c_77,c_79,c_76,c_80]) ).
tcf(c_212,plain,
! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_10,X0),implies(b,X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_55]) ).
tcf(c_222,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_243,plain,
! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_13,X0),implies(not(iPr_def_11),X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_56]) ).
tcf(c_245,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_267,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(not(a),X1)),implies(X0,implies(implies(b,X1),implies(iPr_def_10,X1))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_268,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(not(b),X1)),implies(X0,implies(implies(c,X1),implies(iPr_def_11,X1))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_272,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(X3,X2),implies(implies(X1,X3),X2))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X1),X2))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_317,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_14,implies(b,iPr_def_13))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_212]) ).
tcf(c_513,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_222]) ).
tcf(c_552,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(X2,X0)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_513,c_222]) ).
tcf(c_703,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),implies(X1,implies(X0,X2)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_513,c_245]) ).
tcf(c_1027,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,X0))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_552,c_222]) ).
tcf(c_1234,plain,
! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(a),implies(X0,iPr_def_12))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_703]) ).
tcf(c_1269,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(a),iPr_def_13)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_1234]) ).
tcf(c_1445,plain,
! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(not(a),iPr_def_13)),implies(X0,implies(implies(b,iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_267]) ).
tcf(c_1517,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,implies(X0,X4)))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1027,c_245]) ).
tcf(c_1518,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,implies(X4,X0)))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1027,c_222]) ).
tcf(c_1544,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(b),X0),implies(X1,implies(implies(c,X0),implies(iPr_def_11,X0))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_268,c_222]) ).
tcf(c_2041,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,implies(X4,implies(X5,X0))))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1518,c_222]) ).
tcf(c_2251,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X2),implies(implies(X1,X3),X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X1),X2))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_272,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_2403,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(a),implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(X2,iPr_def_12))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_1517]) ).
tcf(c_2443,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(a),implies(X0,implies(X1,iPr_def_13)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_2403]) ).
tcf(c_2637,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,implies(X4,implies(X5,implies(X0,X6)))))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2041,c_245]) ).
tcf(c_2727,plain,
! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),iPr_def_13),implies(X0,implies(implies(b,iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1445,c_222]) ).
tcf(c_2750,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(b,iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(a),iPr_def_13)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2727,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_2753,plain,
! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(b,iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14))),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2750,c_1269]) ).
tcf(c_2756,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(b,iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2753,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_2944,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(b,iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2443,c_2756]) ).
tcf(c_2965,plain,
( is_a_theorem(iPr_def_14)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(b,iPr_def_13)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2944,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_2968,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(b,iPr_def_13)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2965,c_81]) ).
tcf(c_4708,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(c,X0),implies(iPr_def_11,X0))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(b),X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1544,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_6950,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(c,X0),implies(iPr_def_11,X0)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(b),X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4708,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_7589,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X0),implies(implies(iPr_def_11,X1),X0)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_13,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_243,c_2251]) ).
tcf(c_17000,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(a),implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,implies(X4,iPr_def_12))))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_2637]) ).
tcf(c_20993,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_11,X0),X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_13,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7589,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_21380,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(a),implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,iPr_def_13)))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_17000]) ).
tcf(c_35772,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_13,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,X0))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_20993,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_41749,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(c,X0),implies(iPr_def_11,X0)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(b),X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21380,c_6950]) ).
tcf(c_59649,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(b,iPr_def_13))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_13,implies(b,iPr_def_13))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_317,c_35772]) ).
tcf(c_60149,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_59649,c_2968,c_513]) ).
tcf(c_82149,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(not(b),X1)),implies(X0,implies(implies(c,X1),implies(iPr_def_11,X1))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_82175,plain,
! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_12,X0),implies(c,X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_55]) ).
tcf(c_82176,plain,
! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_13,X0),implies(iPr_def_12,X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_55]) ).
tcf(c_82182,plain,
! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_55]) ).
tcf(c_82183,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_82191,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_82204,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(c,X0))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_12,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82175,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_82207,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_12,X0))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_13,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82176,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_82384,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82182,c_82183]) ).
tcf(c_82406,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82384,c_82207]) ).
tcf(c_82410,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(c,iPr_def_14)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82406,c_82204]) ).
tcf(c_82465,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),implies(X0,implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X3,X1),X2))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_82191]) ).
tcf(c_83140,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),implies(X0,implies(implies(b,X1),implies(iPr_def_10,X1))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_82465]) ).
tcf(c_83188,plain,
! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),implies(X0,implies(implies(b,iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_83140]) ).
tcf(c_83192,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(b,iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(not(X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83188,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_83195,plain,
! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(b,iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14))),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_83192,c_2753]) ).
tcf(c_83197,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(b,iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83195,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_83207,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(b,iPr_def_13),iPr_def_14)),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_83197,c_2944]) ).
tcf(c_83210,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(b),iPr_def_14)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83207,c_82191]) ).
tcf(c_84036,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(b),X0),implies(X1,implies(implies(c,X0),implies(iPr_def_11,X0))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82149,c_82183]) ).
tcf(c_84573,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(c,X0),implies(iPr_def_11,X0))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(b),X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_84036,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_84724,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(c,X0),implies(iPr_def_11,X0)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(b),X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_84573,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_90460,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(c,X0),implies(iPr_def_11,X0)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(b),X0)) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_84724,c_41749]) ).
tcf(c_90467,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,X0))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(c,X0))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(b),X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_90460,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_90958,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(c,iPr_def_14)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83210,c_90467]) ).
tcf(c_90985,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_90958,c_82410]) ).
tcf(c_91185,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_90985,c_60149]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL070-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.39 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 21:51:24 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.39 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.45 % Proving...
% 33.46/6.35 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 33.46/6.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % ------ iProver source info
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 33.46/6.35 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 33.46/6.35 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 33.46/6.35 % ------ Proving...
% 33.46/6.35 % ------ Problem Properties
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 %
% 33.46/6.35 % clauses 10
% 33.46/6.35 % conjectures 1
% 33.46/6.35 % EPR 1
% 33.46/6.35 % Horn 10
% 33.46/6.35 % unary 9
% 33.46/6.35 % binary 0
% 33.46/6.35 % lits 12
% 33.46/6.35 % lits eq 5
% 33.46/6.35 % fd_pure 0
% 33.46/6.35 % fd_pseudo 0
% 33.46/6.35 % fd_cond 0
% 33.46/6.35 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 33.46/6.35 % AC symbols 0
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % ------
% 33.46/6.35 % Current options:
% 33.46/6.35 % ------
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 %
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % ------ Proving...
% 33.46/6.35 %
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 33.46/6.35
% 33.46/6.35
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------