↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : LCL072-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:00:33 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.57s 1.89s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL072-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 10:02:50 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.39  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic H_____011_C07_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0V
% 0.13/0.39  # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptRRHorn.
% 0.13/0.39  #
% 0.13/0.39  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.39  # Number of axioms: 5 Number of unprocessed: 5
% 0.13/0.39  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.39  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.39  # Hello from C++
% 0.67/0.93  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.67/0.93  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.67/0.93  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.67/0.93  # 5 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.67/0.93  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.67/0.93  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.67/0.93  # Found 4 unit axioms.
% 0.67/0.93  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.67/0.93  # 1 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.67/0.93  # 4 unit axiom clauses
% 0.67/0.93  
% 0.67/0.93  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.67/0.93  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 1.57/1.87  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 1.57/1.89  # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts.
% 1.57/1.89  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 1.57/1.89  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 1.57/1.89  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 1.57/1.89  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 1.57/1.89  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 1.57/1.89  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 1.57/1.89  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 1.57/1.89  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.89  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.89  # Begin clausification derivation
% 1.57/1.89  
% 1.57/1.89  # End clausification derivation
% 1.57/1.89  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 1.57/1.89  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3))))).
% 1.57/1.89  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(not(X1),X3))))).
% 1.57/1.89  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(not(X2),X3)),implies(X1,implies(implies(X4,X3),implies(implies(X2,X4),X3))))))).
% 1.57/1.89  cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~is_a_theorem(implies(a,implies(not(a),b))))).
% 1.57/1.89  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (is_a_theorem(X1)|~is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))|~is_a_theorem(X2))).
% 1.57/1.89  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 1.57/1.89  # Begin printing tableau
% 1.57/1.89  # Found 6 steps
% 1.57/1.89  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X7,X6),X5),implies(X6,X5)))), inference(start_rule)).
% 1.57/1.89  cnf(i_0_78678, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X7,X6),X5),implies(X6,X5)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 1.57/1.89  cnf(i_0_78685, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(a,implies(not(a),b)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 1.57/1.89  cnf(i_0_78686, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X7,X6),X5),implies(X6,X5)),implies(a,implies(not(a),b))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 1.57/1.89  cnf(i_0_78689, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,implies(implies(implies(X7,X6),X5),implies(X6,X5))),implies(a,implies(not(a),b))),implies(implies(implies(implies(X7,X6),X5),implies(X6,X5)),implies(a,implies(not(a),b)))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 1.57/1.89  cnf(i_0_78690, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(implies(implies(X7,X6),X5),implies(X6,X5))),implies(a,implies(not(a),b))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_78690, ...])).
% 1.57/1.89  # End printing tableau
% 1.57/1.89  # SZS output end
% 1.57/1.89  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 1.57/1.89  # Returning from population with 6 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 1.57/1.89  # We now have 6 tableaux to operate on
% 1.57/1.89  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 1.57/1.89  # Proof search is over...
% 1.57/1.89  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------