↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : LCL076-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:48:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.53s
% Output   : Proof 1.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL076-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:23:08 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.53  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.47/0.53  
% 0.47/0.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.47/0.53  
% 0.47/0.59  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.47/0.59  Axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.47/0.59  Axiom 2 (cn_18): is_a_theorem(implies(X, implies(Y, X))) = true.
% 0.47/0.59  Axiom 3 (cn_49): is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X), not(Y)), implies(Y, X))) = true.
% 0.47/0.59  Axiom 4 (condensed_detachment): ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(X, Y)), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(X), true, is_a_theorem(Y), true), true) = true.
% 0.47/0.59  Axiom 5 (cn_35): is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, Z)), implies(implies(X, Y), implies(X, Z)))) = true.
% 0.47/0.59  
% 0.47/0.59  Goal 1 (prove_cn_40): is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))) = true.
% 0.47/0.59  Proof:
% 0.47/0.59    is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a))))
% 0.47/0.59  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.47/0.59    ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 0.47/0.59  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 0.47/0.59    ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 0.47/0.60  = { by axiom 2 (cn_18) }
% 0.47/0.60    ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true, ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 0.47/0.60  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.47/0.60    ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 0.47/0.60  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.47/0.60    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 0.47/0.60  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 0.47/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 0.47/0.61  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.47/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 0.47/0.61  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 0.47/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 0.47/0.61  = { by axiom 5 (cn_35) }
% 0.47/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 0.47/0.61  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.47/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.61  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.47/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.61  = { by axiom 3 (cn_49) R->L }
% 1.47/0.62    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.62  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.47/0.62    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.62  = { by axiom 2 (cn_18) R->L }
% 1.47/0.62    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.62  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 1.47/0.62    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.62  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.47/0.62    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.63  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.47/0.63    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true, ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.63  = { by axiom 2 (cn_18) R->L }
% 1.47/0.63    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), not(not(not(a)))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.63  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 1.47/0.63    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.63  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.47/0.63    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.63  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.47/0.63    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.63  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 1.47/0.63    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.63  = { by axiom 2 (cn_18) }
% 1.47/0.63    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.63  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.47/0.63    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.63  = { by axiom 3 (cn_49) }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 5 (cn_35) R->L }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(not(not(a)), not(implies(X, not(not(not(a))))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 5 (cn_35) R->L }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a))), implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(implies(X, not(not(not(a)))), not(a)))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), implies(X, not(not(not(a))))), implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(true, true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 3 (cn_49) R->L }
% 1.47/0.64    ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a)), implies(a, not(not(a))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(a))), not(a))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(a, not(not(a)))), true), true)
% 1.47/0.64  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 1.47/0.64    true
% 1.47/0.64  % SZS output end Proof
% 1.47/0.64  
% 1.47/0.64  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------