↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : LCL077-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:48:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.24s 0.65s
% Output   : Proof 1.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL077-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.39  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:16:19 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/0.65  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 1.24/0.65  
% 1.24/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.24/0.65  
% 1.79/0.72  % SZS output start Proof
% 1.79/0.72  Axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 1.79/0.73  Axiom 2 (cn_18): is_a_theorem(implies(X, implies(Y, X))) = true.
% 1.79/0.73  Axiom 3 (cn_49): is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X), not(Y)), implies(Y, X))) = true.
% 1.79/0.73  Axiom 4 (condensed_detachment): ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(X, Y)), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(X), true, is_a_theorem(Y), true), true) = true.
% 1.79/0.73  Axiom 5 (cn_35): is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, Z)), implies(implies(X, Y), implies(X, Z)))) = true.
% 1.79/0.73  
% 1.79/0.73  Goal 1 (prove_cn_39): is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)) = true.
% 1.79/0.73  Proof:
% 1.79/0.73    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a))
% 1.79/0.73  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.79/0.73    ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.73  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 1.79/0.73    ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)), implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a)))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.73  = { by axiom 5 (cn_35) }
% 1.79/0.73    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.73  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.79/0.73    ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.73  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.79/0.73    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.73  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 1.79/0.73    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.73  = { by axiom 5 (cn_35) }
% 1.79/0.74    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.74  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.79/0.74    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.74  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.79/0.74    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.74  = { by axiom 3 (cn_49) R->L }
% 1.79/0.74    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.74  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.79/0.75    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.75  = { by axiom 2 (cn_18) R->L }
% 1.79/0.75    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.75  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 1.79/0.75    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.75  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.79/0.75    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.75  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.79/0.75    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.75  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 1.79/0.76    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.76  = { by axiom 2 (cn_18) }
% 1.79/0.76    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true, ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.76  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.79/0.76    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.77  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.79/0.77    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.77  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 1.79/0.77    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.77  = { by axiom 2 (cn_18) }
% 1.79/0.77    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.77  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.79/0.77    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.77  = { by axiom 3 (cn_49) }
% 1.79/0.78    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.78  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.79/0.78    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.78  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.79/0.78    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.78  = { by axiom 5 (cn_35) R->L }
% 1.79/0.78    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a))), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(not(implies(X, not(not(a))))), not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.78  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 1.79/0.78    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.79  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.79/0.79    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a)))))), implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a)))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(not(a), not(implies(X, not(not(a))))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(implies(X, not(not(a))), a))), true), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.79  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 1.79/0.79    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.79  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.79/0.79    ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true)
% 1.79/0.79  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.79/0.79    ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true, ifeq(true, true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true), true)
% 1.79/0.79  = { by axiom 2 (cn_18) R->L }
% 1.79/0.79    ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a)))), implies(not(not(a)), a))), true, ifeq(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), implies(X, not(not(a))))), true, is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)), a)), true), true)
% 1.79/0.79  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 1.79/0.79    true
% 1.79/0.79  % SZS output end Proof
% 1.79/0.79  
% 1.79/0.79  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------