↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : LCL077-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:48:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 127.34s 127.67s
% Output   : Proof 127.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  22 unt;   0 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   43 (   0 equ;  16 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( is_a_theorem(Y)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(cn_18,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cn_18) ).

cnf(cn_35,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cn_35) ).

cnf(cn_49,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X),not(Y)),implies(Y,X))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cn_49) ).

cnf(transitivity,axiom,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',transitivity) ).

cnf(prove_cn_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_39) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a)),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[prove_cn_39]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),a))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a))))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[transitivity]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),not(not(a))),implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a))))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),implies(not(not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),not(not(a)))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[transitivity]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),implies(not(not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),not(not(a))))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[cn_18]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),not(not(a))),implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[cn_49]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t4:3]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(not(a),not(a))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(not(a),not(a))),implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),a)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),a)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t2:3]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(implies(not(a),not(a)),a)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(implies(not(a),not(a)),a)),implies(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(not(a),not(a))),implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),a))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(not(a),not(a))),implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),a))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t10:2)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t10:2]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(implies(not(a),not(a)),a)),implies(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(not(a),not(a))),implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),a)))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t12:2)],[cn_35]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t14:1)],[t14:1,t12:2]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(implies(not(a),not(a)),a))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t12:3)],[cn_49]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t16:1)],[t16:1,t12:3]) ).

cnf(t18,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(a),implies(not(implies(not(a),not(a))),not(a))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),implies(not(implies(not(a),not(a))),not(a))),implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(not(a),not(a)))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(not(a),not(a)))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t10:3)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

cnf(t19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t18:1)],[t18:1,t10:3]) ).

cnf(t20,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),implies(not(implies(not(a),not(a))),not(a))),implies(implies(not(a),not(implies(not(a),not(a)))),implies(not(a),not(a))))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t18:2)],[cn_35]) ).

cnf(t21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t20:1)],[t20:1,t18:2]) ).

cnf(t22,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(a),implies(not(implies(not(a),not(a))),not(a)))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t18:3)],[cn_18]) ).

cnf(t23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t22:1)],[t22:1,t18:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL077-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 14:03:53 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 127.34/127.67  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 127.34/127.67  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------