↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : LCL079-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:18:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 33.79s 33.92s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : LCL079-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.07/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun Sep  6 01:04:35 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.24/0.52  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 33.79/33.92  %-------------------------------------------
% 33.79/33.92  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 33.79/33.92  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 33.79/33.92  % Transform   :cnf
% 33.79/33.92  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 33.79/33.92  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  % Result      :Theorem 33.420720s
% 33.79/33.92  % Output      :CNFRefutation 33.420720s
% 33.79/33.92  %-------------------------------------------
% 33.79/33.92  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 33.79/33.92  % File     : LCL079-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 33.79/33.92  % Domain   : Logic Calculi (Implication/Negation 2 valued sentential)
% 33.79/33.92  % Problem  : Transitivity can be derived from Church's system
% 33.79/33.92  % Version  : [ANL] axioms.
% 33.79/33.92  % English  : An axiomatisation of the Implication/Negation 2 valued
% 33.79/33.92  %            sentential calculus is {CN-18,CN-35,CN-49} by Church. Show
% 33.79/33.92  %            that transitivity of implies can be derived from the Church
% 33.79/33.92  %            system.
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  % Refs     :
% 33.79/33.92  % Source   : [ANL]
% 33.79/33.92  % Names    : morgan.one.ver2.in [ANL]
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 33.79/33.92  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.1.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 33.79/33.92  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
% 33.79/33.92  %            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
% 33.79/33.92  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
% 33.79/33.92  %            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
% 33.79/33.92  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 33.79/33.92  %            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 33.79/33.92  %            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn)
% 33.79/33.92  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  % Comments : Contributed to the ANL library by Charles Morgan.
% 33.79/33.92  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 33.79/33.92  cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
% 33.79/33.92      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
% 33.79/33.92      | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
% 33.79/33.92      | is_a_theorem(Y) ) ).
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  cnf(cn_18,axiom,
% 33.79/33.92      is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ).
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  cnf(cn_35,axiom,
% 33.79/33.92      is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z)))) ).
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  cnf(cn_49_reversed,axiom,
% 33.79/33.92      is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Y,X),implies(not(X),not(Y)))) ).
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  cnf(a_implies_b,hypothesis,
% 33.79/33.92      is_a_theorem(implies(a,b)) ).
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  cnf(b_implies_c,hypothesis,
% 33.79/33.92      is_a_theorem(implies(b,c)) ).
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  cnf(prove_transitivity,negated_conjecture,
% 33.79/33.92      ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,c)) ).
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 33.79/33.92  %-------------------------------------------
% 33.79/33.92  % Proof found
% 33.79/33.92  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 33.79/33.92  % SZS output start Proof
% 33.79/33.92  %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 33.79/33.92  %VarNum:18(SingletonVarNum:9)
% 33.79/33.92  %MaxLitNum:3
% 33.79/33.92  %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 33.79/33.92  %SharedTerms:9
% 33.79/33.92  %goalClause: 6
% 33.79/33.92  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 33.79/33.92  [1]P1(f3(a1,a2))
% 33.79/33.92  [2]P1(f3(a2,a4))
% 33.79/33.92  [6]~P1(f3(a1,a4))
% 33.79/33.92  [3]P1(f3(x31,f3(x32,x31)))
% 33.79/33.92  [4]P1(f3(f3(x41,x42),f3(f5(x42),f5(x41))))
% 33.79/33.92  [5]P1(f3(f3(x51,f3(x52,x53)),f3(f3(x51,x52),f3(x51,x53))))
% 33.79/33.92  [7]P1(x71)+~P1(x72)+~P1(f3(x72,x71))
% 33.79/33.92  %EqnAxiom
% 33.79/33.92  
% 33.79/33.92  %-------------------------------------------
% 33.79/33.93  cnf(32,plain,
% 33.79/33.93     (P1(f3(f3(x321,x322),f3(x321,x321)))),
% 33.79/33.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,5,7])).
% 33.79/33.93  cnf(36,plain,
% 33.79/33.93     (P1(f3(x361,x361))),
% 33.79/33.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,32,7])).
% 33.79/33.93  cnf(72,plain,
% 33.79/33.93     (P1(f3(f3(f3(x721,x722),x721),f3(f3(x721,x722),x722)))),
% 33.79/33.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[36,5,7])).
% 33.79/33.93  cnf(453,plain,
% 33.79/33.93     (P1(f3(x4531,f3(a1,a2)))),
% 33.79/33.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,7])).
% 33.79/33.93  cnf(457,plain,
% 33.79/33.93     (P1(f3(f3(f3(a1,a2),x4571),x4571))),
% 33.79/33.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[72,453,7])).
% 33.79/33.93  cnf(462,plain,
% 33.79/33.93     (P1(f3(x4621,f3(a2,a4)))),
% 33.79/33.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,7])).
% 33.79/33.93  cnf(522,plain,
% 33.79/33.93     (P1(f3(f3(x5221,a2),f3(x5221,a4)))),
% 33.79/33.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[462,5,7])).
% 33.79/33.93  cnf(682,plain,
% 33.79/33.93     ($false),
% 33.79/33.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[522,457,6,7]),
% 33.79/33.93     ['proof']).
% 33.79/33.93  % SZS output end Proof
% 33.79/33.93  % Total time :33.420720s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------