%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL079-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQsSgR5MiS true
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 01:35:09 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.85s
% Output : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL079-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQsSgR5MiS true
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 6 01:05:01 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.37 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.12/0.38 % Running in FO mode
% 0.46/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.46/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.46/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.49/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.49/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.49/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.49/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.49/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.49/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.49/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.49/0.85 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.49/0.85 % BCE start: 7
% 0.49/0.85 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.49/0.85 % PE start: 7
% 0.49/0.85 logic: neq
% 0.49/0.85 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.49/0.85 % done 19 iterations in 0.022s
% 0.49/0.85 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.49/0.85 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.49/0.85 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(prove_transitivity, conjecture, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ a @ c ))).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ a @ c ) )),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_transitivity])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ a @ c))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(b_implies_c, axiom, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ b @ c ))).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ b @ c))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_implies_c])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(cn_18, axiom, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ))).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.49/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.85 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_18])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.49/0.85 (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) |
% 0.49/0.85 ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.49/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.85 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.49/0.85 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.49/0.85 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.49/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.85 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0) | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(a_implies_b, axiom, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ a @ b ))).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ a @ b))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a_implies_b])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(cn_35, axiom,
% 0.49/0.85 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.85 ( implies @
% 0.49/0.85 ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) ) @
% 0.49/0.85 ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.49/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.85 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.85 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)) @
% 0.49/0.85 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_35])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.49/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.85 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.49/0.85 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.49/0.85 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.49/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.85 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 0.49/0.85 | (is_a_theorem @
% 0.49/0.85 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.49/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.85 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.49/0.85 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.49/0.85 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 0.49/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.85 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 0.49/0.85 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.49/0.85 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 0.49/0.85 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.85 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ a @ (implies @ b @ X0)))
% 0.49/0.85 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ a @ X0)))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 0.49/0.85 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.85 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ b @ X0))
% 0.49/0.85 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ a @ X0)))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain, ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ a @ c))),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 0.49/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain, ($false),
% 0.49/0.85 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl32])).
% 0.49/0.85
% 0.49/0.85 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.49/0.85
% 0.49/0.85
% 0.49/0.85 % Terminating...
% 0.49/0.90 % Runner terminated.
% 1.92/0.91 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------