%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL080-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yjsIpPJG4I true
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 01:35:09 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 64.23s 9.86s
% Output : Refutation 64.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL080-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yjsIpPJG4I true
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Sat Sep 5 15:18:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.37 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.37 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.11/0.38 % Running in FO mode
% 0.38/0.59 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.38/0.59 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.38/0.59 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.41/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.41/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.41/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.41/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.41/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.41/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.41/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 64.23/9.86 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 64.23/9.86 % BCE start: 5
% 64.23/9.86 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 64.23/9.86 % PE start: 5
% 64.23/9.86 logic: neq
% 64.23/9.86 % PE eliminated: 0
% 64.23/9.86 % done 2078 iterations in 9.171s
% 64.23/9.86 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 64.23/9.86 % SZS output start Refutation
% 64.23/9.86 thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(ic_2, axiom, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ))).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_2])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 64.23/9.86 (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) |
% 64.23/9.86 ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 64.23/9.86 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0) | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(ic_4, axiom,
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 ( implies @
% 64.23/9.86 ( implies @ X @ Y ) @
% 64.23/9.86 ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_4])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 64.23/9.86 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(ic_3, axiom,
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ X ) @ X ))).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_3])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 64.23/9.86 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X0))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X1))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X1)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_4])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 64.23/9.86 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 64.23/9.86 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl26, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @ X3))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl81, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl30, zip_derived_cl26])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl26, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @ X3))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl681, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X3 @ X1) @ X0))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X3 @ X2) @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl81, zip_derived_cl26])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(prove_ic_JLukasiewicz, conjecture,
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 ( implies @
% 64.23/9.86 ( implies @ ( implies @ a @ b ) @ c ) @
% 64.23/9.86 ( implies @ ( implies @ c @ a ) @ ( implies @ e @ a ) ) ))).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 64.23/9.86 (~( is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 ( implies @
% 64.23/9.86 ( implies @ ( implies @ a @ b ) @ c ) @
% 64.23/9.86 ( implies @ ( implies @ c @ a ) @ ( implies @ e @ a ) ) ) )),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_ic_JLukasiewicz])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ c) @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ c @ a) @ (implies @ e @ a))))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl28833, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ a) @ (implies @ e @ a)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl681, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_2])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_2])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 64.23/9.86 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl24, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl51, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl24])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_3])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 64.23/9.86 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl59, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ X1 @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X1) @ X0)))
% 64.23/9.86 | (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl353, plain,
% 64.23/9.86 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.23/9.86 (is_a_theorem @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X2) @ X0) @
% 64.23/9.86 (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl51, zip_derived_cl59])).
% 64.23/9.86 thf(zip_derived_cl28861, plain, ($false),
% 64.23/9.86 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 64.23/9.86 [zip_derived_cl28833, zip_derived_cl353])).
% 64.23/9.86
% 64.23/9.86 % SZS output end Refutation
% 64.23/9.86
% 64.23/9.86
% 64.23/9.86 % Terminating...
% 64.23/9.89 % Runner terminated.
% 10.57/9.92 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------