↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL080-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p4E8VlxMdM true

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:35:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 36.98s 5.99s
% Output   : Refutation 36.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL080-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p4E8VlxMdM true
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 08:44:43 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.09/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.13/0.37  % Running in FO mode
% 0.46/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.46/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.46/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.48/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.48/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.48/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.48/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.48/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.48/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.48/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 36.98/5.99  % Solved by fo/fo13.sh.
% 36.98/5.99  % done 3254 iterations in 5.162s
% 36.98/5.99  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 36.98/5.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% 36.98/5.99  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(ic_2, axiom, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ))).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_2])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 36.98/5.99    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | 
% 36.98/5.99     ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 36.98/5.99          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0) |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(ic_4, axiom,
% 36.98/5.99    (is_a_theorem @
% 36.98/5.99     ( implies @
% 36.98/5.99       ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ 
% 36.98/5.99       ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_4])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_4])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 36.98/5.99          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl35, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99           (implies @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @ 
% 36.98/5.99             X3) @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 36.98/5.99          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl123, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99             (implies @ 
% 36.98/5.99              (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X3) @ (implies @ X2 @ X3)) @ X0))
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl35, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl734, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         ( (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X3) @ 
% 36.98/5.99             (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))
% 36.98/5.99          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X3 @ X0))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl123, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl35, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99           (implies @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @ 
% 36.98/5.99             X3) @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(ic_3, axiom,
% 36.98/5.99    (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ X ) @ X ))).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_3])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(prove_ic_JLukasiewicz, conjecture,
% 36.98/5.99    (is_a_theorem @
% 36.98/5.99     ( implies @
% 36.98/5.99       ( implies @ ( implies @ a @ b ) @ c ) @ 
% 36.98/5.99       ( implies @ ( implies @ c @ a ) @ ( implies @ e @ a ) ) ))).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 36.98/5.99    (~( is_a_theorem @
% 36.98/5.99        ( implies @
% 36.98/5.99          ( implies @ ( implies @ a @ b ) @ c ) @ 
% 36.98/5.99          ( implies @ ( implies @ c @ a ) @ ( implies @ e @ a ) ) ) )),
% 36.98/5.99    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_ic_JLukasiewicz])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99          (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 36.98/5.99           (implies @ (implies @ c @ a) @ (implies @ e @ a))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 36.98/5.99          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99             (implies @ X0 @ 
% 36.98/5.99              (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 36.98/5.99               (implies @ (implies @ c @ a) @ (implies @ e @ a)))))
% 36.98/5.99          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         ~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ 
% 36.98/5.99             (implies @ 
% 36.98/5.99              (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 36.98/5.99               (implies @ (implies @ c @ a) @ (implies @ e @ a))) @ 
% 36.98/5.99              X0) @ 
% 36.98/5.99             (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 36.98/5.99              (implies @ (implies @ c @ a) @ (implies @ e @ a)))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl51, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99          (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 36.98/5.99           (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ (implies @ c @ a) @ (implies @ e @ a)))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 36.98/5.99          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl120, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99             (implies @ X0 @ 
% 36.98/5.99              (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 36.98/5.99               (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 36.98/5.99                (implies @ (implies @ c @ a) @ (implies @ e @ a))))))
% 36.98/5.99          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl51, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl701, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         ~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ 
% 36.98/5.99             (implies @ (implies @ c @ X0) @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ X0)) @ 
% 36.98/5.99             (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 36.98/5.99              (implies @ (implies @ c @ a) @ (implies @ e @ a)))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl35, zip_derived_cl120])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl9235, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99          (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 36.98/5.99           (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ a) @ (implies @ e @ a))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl734, zip_derived_cl701])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl10943, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99          (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ a) @ (implies @ e @ a)))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl9235])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_2])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_3])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X2) @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 36.98/5.99          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl106, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 36.98/5.99          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99              (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl34, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl547, plain,
% 36.98/5.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 36.98/5.99          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 36.98/5.99           (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X2) @ X0) @ 
% 36.98/5.99            (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl106])).
% 36.98/5.99  thf(zip_derived_cl10950, plain, ($false),
% 36.98/5.99      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 36.98/5.99                [zip_derived_cl10943, zip_derived_cl547])).
% 36.98/5.99  
% 36.98/5.99  % SZS output end Refutation
% 36.98/5.99  
% 36.98/5.99  
% 36.98/5.99  % Terminating...
% 36.98/6.03  % Runner terminated.
% 36.98/6.05  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------