↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL083-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:05:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 18.90s 8.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 18.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   29
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  20   ~;  18   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  148 (   0 sgn 148   !;   0   ?; 142   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X3,X0)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ic_JLukasiewicz) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ic_3) ).

tcf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X3,X0)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_107,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X3,X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_124,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X2,X1)),implies(X1,X3)),implies(X4,implies(X1,X3)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_107]) ).

tcf(c_148,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(implies(X3,X1),implies(X4,X1))),implies(X5,implies(implies(X3,X1),implies(X4,X1))))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_107]) ).

tcf(c_275,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X5,implies(implies(X3,X1),implies(X4,X1))))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(implies(X3,X1),implies(X4,X1)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_148,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_431,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1),implies(X3,X1)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_275]) ).

tcf(c_432,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X2)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_275]) ).

tcf(c_512,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_432,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_584,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_431,c_512]) ).

tcf(c_599,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_584,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_673,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_599]) ).

tcf(c_21317,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X3,X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_21325,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),X0),implies(X3,X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_673,c_21317]) ).

tcf(c_21326,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21325,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_21334,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X1,X2)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21325,c_21326]) ).

tcf(c_21335,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X1,X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21334,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_21350,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X0,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_21335]) ).

tcf(c_21356,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X0),implies(X2,X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21350,c_21317]) ).

tcf(c_21391,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21356,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_21392,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X2)),implies(X3,implies(X1,X2)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21356,c_21317]) ).

tcf(c_21407,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21356,c_21391]) ).

tcf(c_21414,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X0),X1),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21407,c_21317]) ).

tcf(c_21433,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21414,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_21445,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1),implies(X3,X1)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_21433]) ).

tcf(c_21453,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X0),implies(X2,X0)),X3),implies(X4,X3))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21445,c_21317]) ).

tcf(c_21533,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X3,X1)),implies(X4,implies(X3,X1)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21392,c_21317]) ).

tcf(c_21550,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X4,implies(X3,X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X3,X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21533,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_21644,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X4,X3))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X0),implies(X2,X0)),X3)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21453,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_21646,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(implies(implies(X2,X3),X2),implies(X4,X2))))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21453,c_21433]) ).

tcf(c_21696,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),X2),implies(X1,X2)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_21550]) ).

tcf(c_21712,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),X2),implies(X1,X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21696,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_21735,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),X1),implies(X0,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_21712]) ).

tcf(c_21769,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X0,X1),X2)),implies(X3,implies(implies(X0,X1),X2)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21735,c_21317]) ).

tcf(c_22209,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(implies(implies(X2,X3),X2),X2)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21769,c_21644]) ).

tcf(c_22276,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(implies(X2,X3),X2),X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_22209,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_22522,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1),X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21646,c_22276]) ).

tcf(c_22679,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1),X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_22522,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_22743,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X0),X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21646,c_22679]) ).

tcf(c_22778,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_22743]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL083-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.38  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 21:54:10 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.45  % Proving...
% 18.90/8.31  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 18.90/8.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % ------  iProver source info
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 18.90/8.31  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 18.90/8.31  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ Proving...
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % 
% 18.90/8.31  % clauses                               3
% 18.90/8.31  % conjectures                           1
% 18.90/8.31  % EPR                                   0
% 18.90/8.31  % Horn                                  3
% 18.90/8.31  % unary                                 2
% 18.90/8.31  % binary                                0
% 18.90/8.31  % lits                                  5
% 18.90/8.31  % lits eq                               0
% 18.90/8.31  % fd_pure                               0
% 18.90/8.31  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 18.90/8.31  % fd_cond                               0
% 18.90/8.31  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 18.90/8.31  % AC symbols                            0
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ 
% 18.90/8.31  % Current options:
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ 
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % 
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % ------ Proving...
% 18.90/8.31  % 
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 18.90/8.31  
% 18.90/8.31  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------