%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL083-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7J0J4cr97M true
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 01:35:09 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 76.57s 11.69s
% Output : Refutation 76.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL083-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7J0J4cr97M true
% 0.11/0.39 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % DateTime : Sat Sep 5 13:59:50 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.39 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.39 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.40 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.40 % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.11/0.40 % Running in FO mode
% 0.46/0.68 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.46/0.68 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.46/0.68 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.51/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.51/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.51/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.51/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.51/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.51/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.51/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 76.57/11.69 % Solved by fo/fo7.sh.
% 76.57/11.69 % done 3572 iterations in 10.836s
% 76.57/11.69 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 76.57/11.69 % SZS output start Refutation
% 76.57/11.69 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(ic_1, axiom, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ X ))).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i]: (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X0))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_1])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(ic_JLukasiewicz, axiom,
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 ( implies @
% 76.57/11.69 ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) @
% 76.57/11.69 ( implies @ ( implies @ Z @ X ) @ ( implies @ U @ X ) ) ))).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X3 @ X0))))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_JLukasiewicz])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 76.57/11.69 (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) |
% 76.57/11.69 ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 76.57/11.69 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X3) @ X2)))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X1) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X3 @ X0))))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_JLukasiewicz])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X1) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X3) @ X2)))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2)) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X3) @ X2)))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl42, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X3 @ X1)) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X4 @ (implies @ X3 @ X1))))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 76.57/11.69 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl140, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X4 @ (implies @ X0 @ X3)) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl42, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl179, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X4 @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2) @ X0) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl140])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 76.57/11.69 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl192, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2) @ X0) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X3))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl179, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i]: (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X0))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_1])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl210, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X3) @ X1) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl192, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X3) @ X2)))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl1620, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2))))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl210, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 76.57/11.69 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl15846, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1620, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl16543, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ X2 @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl15846])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 76.57/11.69 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl17095, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 76.57/11.69 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 76.57/11.69 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X0) @ X0))
% 76.57/11.69 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X2))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16543, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(prove_ic_3, conjecture,
% 76.57/11.69 (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ a @ b ) @ a ) @ a ))).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 76.57/11.69 (~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ a @ b ) @ a ) @ a ) )),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_ic_3])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @ a) @ a))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl17756, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17095, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 76.57/11.69 (![X0 : $i]: (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X0))),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ic_1])).
% 76.57/11.69 thf(zip_derived_cl17909, plain, ($false),
% 76.57/11.69 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17756, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 76.57/11.69
% 76.57/11.69 % SZS output end Refutation
% 76.57/11.69
% 76.57/11.69
% 76.57/11.69 % Terminating...
% 0.55/11.74 % Runner terminated.
% 0.55/11.76 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------