↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL083-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:05:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.26s 2.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  31 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  116 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  24   ~;  20   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   99 (   0 sgn  99   !;   0   ?;  92   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X3,X0)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ic_JLukasiewicz) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ic_1) ).

fof(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ic_3) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X3,X0)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_71,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = implies(a,b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_72,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = implies(iPr_def_10,a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_73,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = implies(iPr_def_11,a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_74,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_71,c_72,c_73]) ).

tcf(c_186,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_10,X0),implies(implies(X0,a),implies(X1,a)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_188,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_12,X0),implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_11),implies(X1,iPr_def_11)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_195,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X3,X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_211,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10),implies(iPr_def_11,implies(X0,a)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_186]) ).

tcf(c_281,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10),implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_211]) ).

tcf(c_387,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_11),implies(X1,iPr_def_11)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_12,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_188,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_589,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X2,X1)),implies(X1,X3)),implies(X4,implies(X1,X3)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_195]) ).

tcf(c_590,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X0),implies(X2,X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_195]) ).

tcf(c_612,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,iPr_def_11),X0),implies(X2,X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_12,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_387,c_195]) ).

tcf(c_740,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_590,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_893,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_590,c_740]) ).

tcf(c_918,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X0),X1),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_893,c_195]) ).

tcf(c_1000,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_918,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_1056,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_281,c_1000]) ).

tcf(c_1089,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),X0),implies(X1,X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1056,c_195]) ).

tcf(c_1296,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X4,implies(X1,X3)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X2,X1)),implies(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_589,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_1543,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_918,c_1296]) ).

tcf(c_1550,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X2,implies(a,X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_12,implies(X0,a)),implies(a,X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_1296]) ).

tcf(c_1622,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1543,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_2153,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_589,c_1622]) ).

tcf(c_2203,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,X1),implies(X3,X1))))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2153,c_1296]) ).

tcf(c_2958,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1089,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_5673,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(a,implies(iPr_def_12,implies(X1,a))))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2153,c_1550]) ).

tcf(c_8061,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,X1),implies(X3,X1))))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2203,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_9795,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(X1,X0),implies(X2,X0)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5673,c_8061]) ).

tcf(c_10649,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_12,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_11),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_612,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_11052,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X2,implies(implies(iPr_def_11,X0),implies(X1,X0))))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_12,implies(implies(iPr_def_11,X0),implies(X1,X0)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_10649]) ).

tcf(c_15617,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),implies(X1,iPr_def_12)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9795,c_11052]) ).

tcf(c_15959,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),implies(X1,iPr_def_12)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_15617,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_16427,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),implies(X0,iPr_def_12))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9795,c_15959]) ).

tcf(c_16446,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,iPr_def_12))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_16427,c_2958]) ).

tcf(c_16448,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,iPr_def_12))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_16446,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_16669,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9795,c_16448]) ).

tcf(c_16681,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(iPr_def_12)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_16669,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_16709,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ is_a_theorem(X0),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16681,c_74]) ).

tcf(c_16710,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16669,c_16709]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL083-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 21:54:23 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/0.44  % Proving...
% 7.26/2.20  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.26/2.20  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % ------  iProver source info
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 7.26/2.20  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 7.26/2.20  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ Proving...
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % 
% 7.26/2.20  % clauses                               7
% 7.26/2.20  % conjectures                           1
% 7.26/2.20  % EPR                                   1
% 7.26/2.20  % Horn                                  7
% 7.26/2.20  % unary                                 6
% 7.26/2.20  % binary                                0
% 7.26/2.20  % lits                                  9
% 7.26/2.20  % lits eq                               3
% 7.26/2.20  % fd_pure                               0
% 7.26/2.20  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 7.26/2.20  % fd_cond                               0
% 7.26/2.20  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 7.26/2.20  % AC symbols                            0
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ 
% 7.26/2.20  % Current options:
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ 
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % 
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % ------ Proving...
% 7.26/2.20  % 
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.26/2.20  
% 7.26/2.20  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------