↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL086-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:57:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.04s 0.32s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   23
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  18   ~;  16   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   99 (  46 sgn   7   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(VAR_1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(VAR_0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

fof(ic_JLukasiewicz_4,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1),implies(VAR_2,VAR_3)),implies(VAR_4,implies(implies(VAR_3,VAR_0),implies(VAR_2,VAR_0))))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ic_JLukasiewicz_4) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,D)),implies(E,implies(implies(D,A),implies(C,A))))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ic_JLukasiewicz_4]) ).

fof(prove_ic_1,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,a)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_ic_1) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,a)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_ic_1]) ).

cnf(c_105,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(E,implies(implies(D,A),implies(C,A))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,D))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(implies(B,C),implies(D,C)),implies(C,E)),implies(F,implies(C,E))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_106,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(B,C),implies(D,C)),implies(C,E)),implies(F,implies(C,E))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),implies(B,D)),implies(E,implies(B,D)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_107,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(E,implies(B,D)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),implies(B,D))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),implies(C,implies(B,C))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_108,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(C,implies(B,C))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(B,implies(A,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_109,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(E,implies(implies(D,A),implies(C,A))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,D))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(B,C),B),implies(C,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_110,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(B,C),B),implies(C,B)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),implies(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_111,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(E,implies(B,D)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),implies(B,D))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_112,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(B,implies(C,B)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_26]) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_26]) ).

cnf(c_113,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(E,implies(implies(D,A),implies(C,A))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,D))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(B,C),B),implies(D,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_114,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(B,C),B),implies(D,B)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_96,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),implies(C,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(C,A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_96]) ).

cnf(c_99,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_96]) ).

cnf(c_116,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(B,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_99]) ).

cnf(c_103,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_116,c_99]) ).

cnf(c_104,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LCL086-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.04/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:50:05 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.30  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.04/0.30  % Process 3133249 was started by sandbox2 on n012,
% 0.04/0.30  % Fri Sep 25 21:50:05 2026
% 0.04/0.30  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.04/0.31  
% 0.04/0.31  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.04/0.32  
% 0.04/0.32  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.04/0.32  
% 0.04/0.32  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.04/0.32  % Length of proof is 16.
% 0.04/0.32  % Level of proof is 13.
% 0.04/0.32  % Maximum clause weight is 90.000.
% 0.04/0.32  % Given clauses 30.
% 0.04/0.32  
% 0.04/0.32  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------