%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL087-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:11:44 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 29 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| is_a_theorem(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(ic_JLukasiewicz_4,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X4)),implies(X5,implies(implies(X4,X1),implies(X3,X1))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ic_JLukasiewicz_4) ).
cnf(prove_ic_2,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,implies(b,a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ic_2) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| is_a_theorem(X2) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X4)),implies(X5,implies(implies(X4,X1),implies(X3,X1))))),
ic_JLukasiewicz_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X5),implies(X4,X2)))
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X4,X3)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X4,X3)),implies(X3,X5)),implies(X6,implies(X3,X5))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X6)
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)),implies(X2,X4)),implies(X5,implies(X2,X4)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)),implies(X2,X4)),implies(X5,implies(X2,X4)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X4,X2),implies(X5,X2)),implies(X2,X3)))
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X3,implies(X2,X3))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,implies(X1,X2)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,implies(X1,X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(implies(X2,X3),X2),implies(X3,X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1),implies(X2,X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1),implies(X2,X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,implies(b,a))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_ic_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,implies(b,a))),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : LCL087-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:04:34 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.41 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1831586 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.12/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.41 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.41 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.41 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 1831594 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Result found by G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.12/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.41 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.41 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.41 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.41 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.41 % Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.12/0.41 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Initial clauses : 3
% 0.12/0.41 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.12/0.41 % Processed clauses : 24
% 0.12/0.41 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % ...remaining for further processing : 24
% 0.12/0.41 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.12/0.41 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.12/0.41 % Generated clauses : 81
% 0.12/0.41 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 72
% 0.12/0.41 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Paramodulations : 81
% 0.12/0.41 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.12/0.41 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 % Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.12/0.41 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.12/0.41 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.41 % Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.12/0.41 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 41
% 0.12/0.41 % ...number of literals in the above : 52
% 0.12/0.41 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.12/0.41 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15
% 0.12/0.41 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.12/0.41 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.12/0.41 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.12/0.41 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % BW rewrite match attempts : 97
% 0.12/0.41 % BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 0.12/0.41 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.41 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1166
% 0.12/0.41 % Search garbage collected termcells : 8
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.41 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.41 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.41 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.41 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.41 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.12/0.41 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.41 % Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.12/0.41 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.41 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------