↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL091-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:27:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.87s 2.05s
% Output   : Refutation 1.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LCL091-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 15:35:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Sat Jul  2 15:35:20 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 3377.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.13/0.36  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.36  in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.19/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 3
% 0.19/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.19/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 4
% 0.19/0.38     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.19/0.38     distinct function count: 1
% 0.19/0.38     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.87/2.05  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.87/2.05  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Model 5 [ 2 0 190 ] (0.00 seconds, 21391 Inserts)
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.67 sec ----> 540 [binary,539.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Length of proof is 19.  Level of proof is 19.
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.87/2.05  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.87/2.05  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  1 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 1.87/2.05  2 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(a,implies(b,a))).
% 1.87/2.05  3 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,D)),implies(implies(D,A),implies(E,implies(C,A))))).
% 1.87/2.05  4 [hyper,3,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(C,D)),implies(E,implies(implies(F,C),implies(C,D))))).
% 1.87/2.05  5 [hyper,4,1,4] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),implies(C,implies(implies(D,E),implies(E,C)))))).
% 1.87/2.05  7 [hyper,5,1,5] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(B,implies(implies(C,D),implies(D,B))))).
% 1.87/2.05  11 [hyper,7,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(B,C)),D),implies(E,implies(C,D)))).
% 1.87/2.05  18 [hyper,11,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,D),implies(D,A))),implies(E,implies(F,implies(implies(C,D),implies(D,A)))))).
% 1.87/2.05  54 [hyper,18,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(implies(C,D),implies(D,implies(D,D)))))).
% 1.87/2.05  106 [hyper,54,1,54] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),implies(C,implies(C,C))))).
% 1.87/2.05  109 [hyper,106,1,106] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(B,implies(B,B)))).
% 1.87/2.05  114 [hyper,109,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,A),B),implies(C,implies(A,B)))).
% 1.87/2.05  122 [hyper,114,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(A,A)),implies(C,implies(D,implies(A,A))))).
% 1.87/2.05  371 [hyper,122,1,114] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(implies(C,C),implies(C,C))))).
% 1.87/2.05  378 [hyper,371,1,371] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,B),implies(B,B)))).
% 1.87/2.05  387 [hyper,378,1,378] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,A),implies(A,A))).
% 1.87/2.05  400 [hyper,387,1,122] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,C)))).
% 1.87/2.05  447 [hyper,400,1,400] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,B))).
% 1.87/2.05  487 [hyper,447,1,447] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)).
% 1.87/2.05  504 [hyper,487,1,4] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),implies(C,implies(D,C))))).
% 1.87/2.05  524 [hyper,504,1,504] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(B,implies(C,B)))).
% 1.87/2.05  539 [hyper,524,1,487] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).
% 1.87/2.05  540 [binary,539.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.87/2.05  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  ============ end of search ============
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  true clauses given           5      (6.5%)
% 1.87/2.05  false clauses given         72
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.87/2.05    10  0         1
% 1.87/2.05    12  1         2
% 1.87/2.05    14  5         2
% 1.87/2.05    16  10        2
% 1.87/2.05    18  21        2
% 1.87/2.05    20  30        1
% 1.87/2.05    22  39        1
% 1.87/2.05    24  40        3
% 1.87/2.05    26  25        4
% 1.87/2.05    28  15        2
% 1.87/2.05    30  11        1
% 1.87/2.05    32  8         0
% 1.87/2.05    34  4         0
% 1.87/2.05    36  4         0
% 1.87/2.05    38  2         0
% 1.87/2.05    40  2         0
% 1.87/2.05    42  1         0
% 1.87/2.05  tot:  218       21      (8.8% true)
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Model 5 [ 2 0 190 ] (0.00 seconds, 21391 Inserts)
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.87/2.05  
% 1.87/2.05  Process 3377 finished Sat Jul  2 15:35:22 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------