↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : LCL092-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:00:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.36s 0.64s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL092-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.20/0.45  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.45  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 22:26:39 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.51  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_____0019_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.24/0.51  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.24/0.51  #
% 0.24/0.51  # Number of axioms: 3 Number of unprocessed: 3
% 0.24/0.51  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.24/0.51  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.24/0.51  # Hello from C++
% 0.36/0.63  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.36/0.63  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.36/0.63  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.36/0.63  # 3 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.36/0.63  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.36/0.63  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.36/0.63  # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.36/0.63  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.36/0.63  # 1 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.36/0.63  # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.36/0.63  
% 0.36/0.63  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.36/0.63  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.36/0.64  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.36/0.64  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.36/0.64  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.36/0.64  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.36/0.64  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.36/0.64  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.36/0.64  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.36/0.64  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.36/0.64  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.64  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.64  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.36/0.64  
% 0.36/0.64  # End clausification derivation
% 0.36/0.64  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.36/0.64  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (is_a_theorem(X2)|~is_a_theorem(X1)|~is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)))).
% 0.36/0.64  cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a)))).
% 0.36/0.64  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X4)),implies(implies(X4,X1),implies(X5,implies(X3,X1))))))).
% 0.36/0.64  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.36/0.64  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.36/0.64  # Found 6 steps
% 0.36/0.64  cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.36/0.64  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.36/0.64  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X12,X11),implies(X10,X9)),implies(implies(X9,X12),implies(X8,implies(X10,X12)))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.36/0.64  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X12,X11),implies(X10,X9)),implies(implies(X9,X12),implies(X8,implies(X10,X12)))),implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.36/0.64  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X4,X5)),implies(implies(X5,X1),implies(X6,implies(X4,X1)))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.36/0.64  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X4,X5)),implies(implies(X5,X1),implies(X6,implies(X4,X1)))),implies(implies(implies(implies(X12,X11),implies(X10,X9)),implies(implies(X9,X12),implies(X8,implies(X10,X12)))),implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_13, ...])).
% 0.36/0.64  # End printing tableau
% 0.36/0.64  # SZS output end
% 0.36/0.64  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.36/0.64  # Returning from population with 1 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.36/0.64  # We now have 1 tableaux to operate on
% 0.36/0.64  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.36/0.64  # Proof search is over...
% 0.36/0.64  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------