↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL096-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:11:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.26s 0.94s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   47 (  24 unt;   0 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   77 (   0 equ;  36 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  148 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(lg_2,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),equivalent(X2,X3)),X4),X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lg_2) ).

cnf(lg_4,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X3),X4),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X5),X3),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X5),X4)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lg_4) ).

cnf(lg_3,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),X4),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),X4)),X5),X5)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lg_3) ).

cnf(prove_lg_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,b),a)),c),c)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_lg_1) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),equivalent(X2,X3)),X4),X4)),
    lg_2 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X3),X4),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X5),X3),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X5),X4)))),
    lg_4 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),equivalent(X2,X4)),equivalent(X3,X4)),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X4),X3),X5))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X3),equivalent(equivalent(X4,X2),X5))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),equivalent(equivalent(X4,X2),equivalent(X4,X3)))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X5),X1),equivalent(X5,X3)),X4))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X3)),X4)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X4,X2),equivalent(X4,X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),X4)),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X2),X4))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,X2),X3)),equivalent(X1,X3))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X3,X3),X2)))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),X4),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),X4)),X5),X5)),
    lg_3 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X2)),equivalent(X1,X3)),X3)),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X3))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,X2),X3))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),equivalent(X2,X4)),X5),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X4),X5)),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,X3)),equivalent(X2,X1)))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X3,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X2)),X3),X3)),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,b),a)),c),c)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_lg_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,equivalent(equivalent(X3,X3),X1)))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X1)),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X4,X4),X2),X3))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),equivalent(X3,X2)))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,b),a)),c),c)),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X4))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X3,X4),equivalent(X3,X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X4,X2),X5))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X4,X1),X5),X3))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X2),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X3,equivalent(X4,X4)),equivalent(X3,X2))))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),equivalent(X2,c)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,b),a)),c),X1)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X5,X1),equivalent(X5,X2)),X3),X4))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X3),X4)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,X3)),equivalent(X2,X1)))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,c))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,b),a)),c),X1)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X3))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X5,equivalent(X2,X3)),equivalent(X5,X4)))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),X4)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),X3)),X3)),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,equivalent(X3,equivalent(equivalent(X3,equivalent(X4,X4)),X2))))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(c,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,b),a)),X1),c)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X3)),equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X3,X2),X4))),X4)),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,X3)),X1)))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL096-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:04:33 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.26/0.93  % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.26/0.93  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.26/0.93  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.26/0.93  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.26/0.93  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.26/0.93  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.26/0.93  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.26/0.93  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2113357 completed with status 0
% 3.26/0.93  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 3.26/0.93  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.26/0.93  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.26/0.93  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.26/0.93  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.26/0.93  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.26/0.93  % Search class: FHUNS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 3.26/0.93  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.26/0.93  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/0.93  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.26/0.93  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/0.93  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/0.93  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/0.94  % G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with pid 2113363 completed with status 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Result found by G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00
% 3.26/0.94  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.26/0.94  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.26/0.94  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.26/0.94  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.26/0.94  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.26/0.94  % Search class: FHUNS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 3.26/0.94  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.26/0.94  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/0.94  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.26/0.94  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.26/0.94  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 3.26/0.94  
% 3.26/0.94  % Proof found!
% 3.26/0.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.26/0.94  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.26/0.94  % Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 3.26/0.94  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Initial clauses                      : 5
% 3.26/0.94  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 3.26/0.94  % Processed clauses                    : 910
% 3.26/0.94  % ...of these trivial                  : 72
% 3.26/0.94  % ...subsumed                          : 577
% 3.26/0.94  % ...remaining for further processing  : 261
% 3.26/0.94  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 3.26/0.94  % Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 3.26/0.94  % Generated clauses                    : 14548
% 3.26/0.94  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13559
% 3.26/0.94  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Paramodulations                      : 14548
% 3.26/0.94  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1481
% 3.26/0.94  % ...of those cached                   : 1270
% 3.26/0.94  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.26/0.94  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.26/0.94  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.26/0.94  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.26/0.94  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.26/0.94  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.26/0.94  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.26/0.94  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.26/0.94  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.26/0.94  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.26/0.94  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.26/0.94  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.26/0.94  % Current number of processed clauses  : 254
% 3.26/0.94  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 113
% 3.26/0.94  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.26/0.94  %    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 3.26/0.94  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 137
% 3.26/0.94  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12624
% 3.26/0.94  % ...number of literals in the above   : 32088
% 3.26/0.94  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 3.26/0.94  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4928
% 3.26/0.94  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4059
% 3.26/0.94  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 562
% 3.26/0.94  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 251
% 3.26/0.94  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8576
% 3.26/0.94  % BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 3.26/0.94  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.26/0.94  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 197147
% 3.26/0.94  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 8
% 3.26/0.94  
% 3.26/0.94  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.26/0.94  % User time                : 0.428 s
% 3.26/0.94  % System time              : 0.031 s
% 3.26/0.94  % Total time               : 0.459 s
% 3.26/0.94  % Maximum resident set size: 3588 pages
% 3.26/0.94  
% 3.26/0.94  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.26/0.94  % User time                : 2.178 s
% 3.26/0.94  % System time              : 0.133 s
% 3.26/0.94  % Total time               : 2.311 s
% 3.26/0.94  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 3.26/0.94  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------