↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL097-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:57:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  12   ~;  10   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (   0 sgn  11   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(VAR_1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(VAR_0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

fof(lg_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1),equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_2)),equivalent(VAR_1,VAR_2)),VAR_3),VAR_3)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',lg_2) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),equivalent(B,C)),D),D)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[lg_2]) ).

fof(lg_3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1),equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_2)),VAR_3),equivalent(equivalent(VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_3)),VAR_4),VAR_4)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',lg_3) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),D),equivalent(equivalent(B,C),D)),E),E)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[lg_3]) ).

fof(prove_lg_4,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_lg_4) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_lg_4]) ).

cnf(c_287,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(E)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),D),equivalent(equivalent(B,C),D)),E)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C),equivalent(equivalent(D,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,D),C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_287,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_288,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(E)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),D),equivalent(equivalent(B,C),D)),E)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_288,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_289,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(E)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),D),equivalent(equivalent(B,C),D)),E)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(C,D),equivalent(C,E)),A),equivalent(equivalent(D,E),B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_289,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_290,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(D,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,D),C)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(C,A),equivalent(C,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_290,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_291,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(E)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),D),equivalent(equivalent(B,C),D)),E)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D)),E)),equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(C,D),E)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_291,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_292,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(C,D),E)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D)),E))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_285,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C),D),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,E),C),equivalent(equivalent(B,E),D)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_292,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_286,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : LCL097-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.43  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:50:32 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.44  % Process 332142 was started by sandbox2 on n005,
% 0.17/0.44  % Fri Sep 25 21:50:32 2026
% 0.17/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.17/0.50  
% 0.17/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.50  
% 0.17/0.50  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 0.17/0.50  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.17/0.50  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.17/0.50  % Maximum clause weight is 95.000.
% 0.17/0.50  % Given clauses 33.
% 0.17/0.50  
% 0.17/0.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------