↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL097-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aY58o4wncO true

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:35:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 1.01s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL097-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aY58o4wncO true
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 18:48:38 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.37  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.11/0.37  % Running in FO mode
% 0.42/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.42/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.42/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.44/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.46/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.46/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.46/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.46/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.46/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.46/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.47/1.01  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.47/1.01  % BCE start: 4
% 0.47/1.01  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.47/1.01  % PE start: 4
% 0.47/1.01  logic: neq
% 0.47/1.01  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.47/1.01  % done 135 iterations in 0.261s
% 0.47/1.01  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.47/1.01  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.47/1.01  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(equivalent_type, type, equivalent: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(falsehood_type, type, falsehood: $i).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(prove_lg_4, conjecture,
% 0.47/1.01    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.47/1.01     ( equivalent @
% 0.47/1.01       ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ a @ b ) @ c ) @ e ) @ 
% 0.47/1.01       ( equivalent @
% 0.47/1.01         ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ a @ falsehood ) @ c ) @ 
% 0.47/1.01         ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ b @ falsehood ) @ e ) ) ))).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.47/1.01    (~( is_a_theorem @
% 0.47/1.01        ( equivalent @
% 0.47/1.01          ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ a @ b ) @ c ) @ e ) @ 
% 0.47/1.01          ( equivalent @
% 0.47/1.01            ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ a @ falsehood ) @ c ) @ 
% 0.47/1.01            ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ b @ falsehood ) @ e ) ) ) )),
% 0.47/1.01    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_lg_4])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01          (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ b) @ c) @ e) @ 
% 0.47/1.01           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ falsehood) @ c) @ 
% 0.47/1.01            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ falsehood) @ e))))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(lg_3, axiom,
% 0.47/1.01    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.47/1.01     ( equivalent @
% 0.47/1.01       ( equivalent @
% 0.47/1.01         ( equivalent @
% 0.47/1.01           ( equivalent @
% 0.47/1.01             ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) @ ( equivalent @ X @ Z ) ) @ 
% 0.47/1.01             U ) @ 
% 0.47/1.01           ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ Y @ Z ) @ U ) ) @ 
% 0.47/1.01         V ) @ 
% 0.47/1.01       V ))).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01           (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01            (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01               X3) @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01             X4) @ 
% 0.47/1.01            X4))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lg_3])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01           (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01            (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01               X3) @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01             X4) @ 
% 0.47/1.01            X4))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lg_3])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.47/1.01    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.47/1.01     ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.47/1.01          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.47/1.01          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01                (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01                X1) @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @ X1)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01              X0))
% 0.47/1.01          |  (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3) @ X0) @ 
% 0.47/1.01            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X3) @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01                (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01                X1) @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @ X1)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01              X0))
% 0.47/1.01          |  (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X0) @ 
% 0.47/1.01            (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X1)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01              X3) @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01                (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01                X1) @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @ X1)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01              X0))
% 0.47/1.01          |  (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl52, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i, X6 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01           (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01            (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X6 @ X4) @ (equivalent @ X6 @ X3)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X5 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X5 @ X1)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01              X0)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X3) @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl14, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(lg_2, axiom,
% 0.47/1.01    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.47/1.01     ( equivalent @
% 0.47/1.01       ( equivalent @
% 0.47/1.01         ( equivalent @
% 0.47/1.01           ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) @ ( equivalent @ X @ Z ) ) @ 
% 0.47/1.01           ( equivalent @ Y @ Z ) ) @ 
% 0.47/1.01         U ) @ 
% 0.47/1.01       U ))).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01           (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01            (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01             X3) @ 
% 0.47/1.01            X3))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lg_2])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01                (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01                X1) @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @ X1)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01              X0))
% 0.47/1.01          |  (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01              (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01                (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X2)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01                X1) @ 
% 0.47/1.01               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @ X1)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01              X0))
% 0.47/1.01          |  (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.01           (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01            (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.01             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1)) @ 
% 0.47/1.01             X0) @ 
% 0.47/1.01            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.47/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.47/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.01         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.47/1.01          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.47/1.01          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.47/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.47/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 0.47/1.02      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.02         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.02             (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.02              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1)) @ 
% 0.47/1.02              X0))
% 0.47/1.02          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 0.47/1.02      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.47/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl839, plain,
% 0.47/1.02      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.47/1.02          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.47/1.02           (equivalent @ 
% 0.47/1.02            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X2) @ X3) @ X0) @ 
% 0.47/1.02            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X1) @ X3) @ 
% 0.47/1.02             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 0.47/1.02      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl52, zip_derived_cl15])).
% 0.47/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl871, plain, ($false),
% 0.47/1.02      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl839])).
% 0.47/1.02  
% 0.47/1.02  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.47/1.02  
% 0.47/1.02  
% 0.47/1.02  % Terminating...
% 1.57/1.09  % Runner terminated.
% 1.57/1.11  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------