↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL101-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:57:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  15   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   84 (   0 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(VAR_1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(VAR_0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

fof(lg_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1),equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_2)),equivalent(VAR_1,VAR_2)),VAR_3),VAR_3)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',lg_2) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),equivalent(B,C)),D),D)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[lg_2]) ).

fof(p_4,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(VAR_0,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(VAR_1,VAR_2),equivalent(VAR_1,VAR_3)),equivalent(VAR_2,VAR_3)),VAR_0))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',p_4) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D)),equivalent(C,D)),A))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[p_4]) ).

fof(prove_p_1,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(equivalent(e,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,e),c)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_p_1) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(equivalent(e,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,e),c)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_p_1]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(D)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),equivalent(B,C)),D)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),equivalent(B,C)),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(D,E),equivalent(D,F)),equivalent(E,F)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(D)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),equivalent(B,C)),D)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),equivalent(B,C))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(B,C))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(B,C))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D)),equivalent(C,D)),A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),equivalent(B,C)),equivalent(D,D))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(B,C))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(C,A),equivalent(C,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_61,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(D)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),equivalent(B,C)),D)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D))),equivalent(A,equivalent(C,D)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_62,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(C,D)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),D),equivalent(equivalent(B,C),D))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(B,C),D))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),D)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C),equivalent(equivalent(D,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,D),C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL101-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:52:39 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.36  % Process 1188452 was started by sandbox2 on n003,
% 0.11/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 21:52:39 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.38  % Length of proof is 14.
% 0.13/0.38  % Level of proof is 10.
% 0.13/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 99.000.
% 0.13/0.38  % Given clauses 21.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------