↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL102-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:57:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.87s 1.01s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  13   ~;  11   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   80 (   0 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(VAR_1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(VAR_0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

fof(lg_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1),equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_2)),equivalent(VAR_1,VAR_2)),VAR_3),VAR_3)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',lg_2) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),equivalent(B,C)),D),D)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[lg_2]) ).

fof(q_1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(VAR_0,equivalent(equivalent(VAR_1,VAR_2),equivalent(equivalent(VAR_2,VAR_1),VAR_0)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',q_1) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(equivalent(C,B),A)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[q_1]) ).

fof(q_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1),equivalent(equivalent(VAR_2,VAR_0),equivalent(VAR_2,VAR_1)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',q_2) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(C,A),equivalent(C,B)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[q_2]) ).

fof(prove_p_1,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(equivalent(e,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,e),c)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_p_1) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(equivalent(e,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,e),c)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_p_1]) ).

cnf(c_1281,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(D)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),equivalent(B,C)),D)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D))),equivalent(A,equivalent(C,D)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1281,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_1282,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(C,A),equivalent(C,B)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(C,D),equivalent(equivalent(D,C),B))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1282,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_1283,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(C,A),equivalent(C,B)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D)),equivalent(C,D)),E)),equivalent(A,E))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1283,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_1284,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(C,D)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C),D),equivalent(C,equivalent(equivalent(B,A),D)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1284,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_1285,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,E))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D)),equivalent(C,D)),E))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_110,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(D,A),equivalent(D,B)),C))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1285,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_1286,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(C,D)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_321,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(C,A),D)),equivalent(equivalent(C,B),D))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1286,c_110]) ).

cnf(c_1287,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(C,equivalent(equivalent(B,A),D)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C),D)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_1279,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C),equivalent(equivalent(D,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,D),C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1287,c_321]) ).

cnf(c_1280,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1279,c_5]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL102-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:51:33 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.19/0.44  % Process 3814108 was started by sandbox on n019,
% 0.19/0.44  % Fri Sep 25 21:51:33 2026
% 0.19/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 3.87/1.01  
% 3.87/1.01  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 3.87/1.01  
% 3.87/1.01  % Proof 1 at 0.37 (+ 0.17) seconds.
% 3.87/1.01  % Length of proof is 13.
% 3.87/1.01  % Level of proof is 5.
% 3.87/1.01  % Maximum clause weight is 95.000.
% 3.87/1.01  % Given clauses 135.
% 3.87/1.01  
% 3.87/1.01  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------