↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LCL107-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:50:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 57.63s 14.54s
% Output   : Refutation 57.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   11 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  104 (   6   ~;   4   |;   0   &;  94   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (  10 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0   ^;  18   !;   0   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(is_a_theorem_decl,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

thf(equivalent_decl,type,
    equivalent: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(a_decl,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(b_decl,type,
    b: $i ).

thf(c_decl,type,
    c: $i ).

thf(e_decl,type,
    e: $i ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( c @ ( e @ ( a @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ ( b @ ( e @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ ( c @ ( b @ ( a @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ is_a_theorem ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p_1) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ( c @ ( e @ ( a @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ ( b @ ( e @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ ( c @ ( b @ ( a @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ is_a_theorem ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ is_a_theorem )
      | ~ ( A @ is_a_theorem )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ equivalent ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ is_a_theorem )
      | ~ ( A @ is_a_theorem )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ equivalent ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( G @ ( A @ ( B @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ ( C @ equivalent ) @ ( G @ ( D @ ( F @ equivalent ) @ ( E @ ( F @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ ( E @ ( D @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ is_a_theorem ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lg_27_1690) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( G @ ( A @ ( B @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ ( C @ equivalent ) @ ( G @ ( D @ ( F @ equivalent ) @ ( E @ ( F @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ ( E @ ( D @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ equivalent ) @ is_a_theorem ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(2866,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[4,6,8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL107-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.24/0.50  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.24/0.50  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.24/0.50  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.24/0.50  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.24/0.50  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.24/0.50  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.24/0.50  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.24/0.50  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:49:23 UTC 2026
% 0.24/0.50  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/0.50  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.58/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.93/1.67  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (267ms). 
% 1.93/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 3.05/2.34  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 3.05/2.35  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.24/2.49  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.39/2.54  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 2 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.39/2.56  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 3.39/2.56  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.39/2.57  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 57.63/14.54  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 57.63/14.54  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 57.63/14.54  % Time passed: 13817ms (effective reasoning time: 12836ms)
% 57.63/14.54  % Axioms used in derivation (2): condensed_detachment, lg_27_1690
% 57.63/14.54  % No. of inferences in proof: 7
% 57.63/14.54  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 13817 ms resp. 12836 ms w/o parsing
% 57.63/14.57  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 57.63/14.57  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------