↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL109-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:05:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 30.63s 7.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 30.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   66 (  66 unt;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  120 (  65 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   82 (   0 sgn  82   !;   0   ?;  53   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : ifeq(X0,X0,X1,X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] : implies(truth,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_1) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : implies(implies(X0,X1),X1) = implies(implies(X1,X0),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_3) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] : implies(X0,X0) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0] : truth = implies(X0,X0),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0] : implies(X0,truth) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_3) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0] : truth = implies(X0,truth),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,implies(X1,X0)) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_4) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : truth = implies(X0,implies(X1,X0)),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : ifeq(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2),truth) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_5) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : truth = ifeq(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2),truth),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X2,X1))) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_6) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : truth = implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)) = implies(X1,implies(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_7) ).

fof(f25,negated_conjecture,
    implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a)) != truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_wajsberg_mv_4) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    truth != implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a)),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f25]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ifeq(X0,X0,X1,X2) = X1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : implies(truth,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : implies(implies(X0,X1),X1) = implies(implies(X1,X0),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : implies(X0,X0) = truth,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : implies(X0,truth) = truth,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : implies(X0,implies(X1,X0)) = truth,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ifeq(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2),truth) = truth,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X2,X1))) = truth,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)) = implies(X1,implies(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a)) != truth,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_126,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X2,implies(implies(X2,X0),X1))) = truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_127,plain,
    implies(b,implies(implies(b,implies(implies(a,b),a)),a)) != truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_135,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = implies(a,b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_136,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = implies(iPr_def_10,a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_137,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = implies(b,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_138,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = implies(iPr_def_12,a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_139,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = implies(b,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_141,plain,
    iPr_def_14 != truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_135,c_136,c_137,c_138,c_139]) ).

tcf(c_142,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X2,implies(implies(X2,X0),X1))) = truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_126]) ).

tcf(c_147,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)) = implies(X1,implies(X0,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).

tcf(c_148,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ifeq(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2),truth) = truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_74]) ).

tcf(c_149,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : implies(X0,implies(X1,X0)) = truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_73]) ).

tcf(c_150,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : implies(X0,truth) = truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

tcf(c_152,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : implies(X0,X0) = truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70]) ).

tcf(c_153,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : implies(implies(X0,X1),X1) = implies(implies(X1,X0),X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68]) ).

tcf(c_155,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : implies(truth,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).

tcf(c_156,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ifeq(X0,X0,X1,X2) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

tcf(c_358,plain,
    implies(b,iPr_def_10) = truth,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_135,c_149]) ).

tcf(c_370,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),implies(X1,implies(truth,X2))) = truth,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_149,c_142]) ).

tcf(c_373,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : implies(X0,implies(implies(implies(X1,X0),X2),X2)) = truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_370,c_155,c_147]) ).

tcf(c_410,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : implies(iPr_def_10,implies(X0,a)) = implies(X0,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_147]) ).

tcf(c_411,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : implies(b,implies(X0,iPr_def_11)) = implies(X0,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_147]) ).

tcf(c_413,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : implies(b,implies(X0,iPr_def_13)) = implies(X0,iPr_def_14),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_147]) ).

tcf(c_513,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq(implies(X0,b),iPr_def_14,implies(X0,iPr_def_13),truth) = truth,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_827,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : implies(b,implies(X0,iPr_def_10)) = implies(X0,truth),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_358,c_147]) ).

tcf(c_833,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : implies(b,implies(X0,iPr_def_10)) = truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_827,c_150]) ).

tcf(c_7472,plain,
    implies(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13) = implies(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_410]) ).

tcf(c_8262,plain,
    implies(b,implies(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_11)) = implies(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7472,c_413]) ).

tcf(c_8304,plain,
    implies(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14) = truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_8262,c_152,c_411]) ).

tcf(c_9141,plain,
    implies(implies(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_10) = implies(truth,iPr_def_14),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8304,c_153]) ).

tcf(c_9151,plain,
    implies(implies(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_9141,c_155]) ).

tcf(c_9399,plain,
    implies(b,iPr_def_14) = truth,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9151,c_833]) ).

tcf(c_12080,plain,
    implies(implies(iPr_def_14,b),b) = implies(truth,iPr_def_14),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9399,c_153]) ).

tcf(c_12093,plain,
    implies(implies(iPr_def_14,b),b) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_12080,c_155]) ).

tcf(c_23775,plain,
    ifeq(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_14,implies(implies(iPr_def_14,b),iPr_def_13),truth) = truth,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_12093,c_513]) ).

tcf(c_23789,plain,
    implies(implies(iPr_def_14,b),iPr_def_13) = truth,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_23775,c_156]) ).

tcf(c_35603,plain,
    implies(b,implies(truth,iPr_def_13)) = truth,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_23789,c_373]) ).

tcf(c_35616,plain,
    truth = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_35603,c_155,c_413]) ).

tcf(c_35927,plain,
    iPr_def_14 != iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_141,c_35616]) ).

tcf(c_35928,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_35927]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL109-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 21:57:33 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.41  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.42  
% 0.12/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.42  
% 0.12/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.44  % Proving...
% 30.63/7.36  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 30.63/7.36  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 30.63/7.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % ------  iProver source info
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 30.63/7.36  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 30.63/7.36  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 3  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 30.63/7.36  % ------ Proving...
% 30.63/7.36  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % 
% 30.63/7.36  % clauses                               22
% 30.63/7.36  % conjectures                           0
% 30.63/7.36  % EPR                                   1
% 30.63/7.36  % Horn                                  22
% 30.63/7.36  % unary                                 22
% 30.63/7.36  % binary                                0
% 30.63/7.36  % lits                                  22
% 30.63/7.36  % lits eq                               22
% 30.63/7.36  % fd_pure                               0
% 30.63/7.36  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 30.63/7.36  % fd_cond                               0
% 30.63/7.36  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 30.63/7.36  % AC symbols                            0
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % ------ 
% 30.63/7.36  % Current options:
% 30.63/7.36  % ------ 
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % 
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % ------ Proving...
% 30.63/7.36  % 
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 30.63/7.36  
% 30.63/7.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------