↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL109-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:18:29 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 11.61s 2.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   43 (  43 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   43 (  42 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(wajsberg_2,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_2) ).

cnf(wajsberg_1,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_1) ).

cnf(wajsberg_3,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_3) ).

cnf(wajsberg_4,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_4) ).

cnf(prove_wajsberg_mv_4,negated_conjecture,
    implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a)) != truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_wajsberg_mv_4) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    wajsberg_2 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    wajsberg_1 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    wajsberg_3 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,truth),truth) = implies(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    implies(X1,X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,truth),truth) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    implies(X1,truth) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_12]),c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    wajsberg_4 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_13]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(truth)),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    implies(not(truth),X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    implies(not(X1),implies(X1,X2)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,not(truth)),not(truth)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_17]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    implies(not(implies(X1,not(truth))),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(not(X1),not(truth))) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_20]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    implies(not(X1),not(truth)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_21]),c_0_6]),c_0_16]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)),X4),implies(implies(X3,X1),X4)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),X3),implies(X1,X3)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)),implies(X3,X1)),implies(X3,X1)) = implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    implies(X1,not(truth)) = not(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_22]),c_0_17]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)),implies(X2,implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    implies(not(X1),not(X2)) = implies(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_26]),c_0_14]),c_0_6]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_26]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)) = implies(X2,implies(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_27]),c_0_6]),c_0_27]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = implies(not(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    implies(X1,not(X2)) = implies(X2,not(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a)) != truth,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_wajsberg_mv_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)),implies(implies(implies(X3,X2),X2),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    implies(not(X1),implies(X2,not(X3))) = implies(X2,implies(X3,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X1) = implies(X2,not(implies(X1,not(X2)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a)) != truth,
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,implies(X1,X3)),implies(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X2),X3))) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_28]),c_0_35]),c_0_30]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,not(X2)),not(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X1))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_36]),c_0_31]),c_0_13]),c_0_6]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    implies(b,implies(implies(b,implies(implies(a,b),a)),a)) != truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_30]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,X1),X2)),X2)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_28]),c_0_31]),c_0_18]),c_0_28]),c_0_6]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL109-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:05:21 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.61/2.15  % Version: 3.5.1
% 11.61/2.15  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 11.61/2.15  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1268981 completed with status 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 11.61/2.15  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 11.61/2.15  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 11.61/2.15  % No SInE strategy applied
% 11.61/2.15  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 11.61/2.15  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1268985 completed with status 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 11.61/2.15  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 11.61/2.15  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 11.61/2.15  % No SInE strategy applied
% 11.61/2.15  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 11.61/2.15  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 11.61/2.15  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 11.61/2.15  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 11.61/2.15  
% 11.61/2.15  % Proof found!
% 11.61/2.15  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 11.61/2.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.61/2.15  % Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 11.61/2.15  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Initial clauses                      : 5
% 11.61/2.15  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 11.61/2.15  % Processed clauses                    : 2074
% 11.61/2.15  % ...of these trivial                  : 1463
% 11.61/2.15  % ...subsumed                          : 298
% 11.61/2.15  % ...remaining for further processing  : 313
% 11.61/2.15  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Backward-rewritten                   : 119
% 11.61/2.15  % Generated clauses                    : 144903
% 11.61/2.15  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 58664
% 11.61/2.15  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Paramodulations                      : 144903
% 11.61/2.15  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % NegExts                              : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Total rewrite steps                  : 305172
% 11.61/2.15  % ...of those cached                   : 251422
% 11.61/2.15  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 11.61/2.15  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 11.61/2.15  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 11.61/2.15  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 11.61/2.15  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 11.61/2.15  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 11.61/2.15  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 11.61/2.15  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 11.61/2.15  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 11.61/2.15  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 11.61/2.15  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 11.61/2.15  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 11.61/2.15  % Current number of processed clauses  : 194
% 11.61/2.15  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 181
% 11.61/2.15  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 13
% 11.61/2.15  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 11.61/2.15  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 54863
% 11.61/2.15  % ...number of literals in the above   : 54863
% 11.61/2.15  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Current number of archived clauses   : 119
% 11.61/2.15  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 270
% 11.61/2.15  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 6300
% 11.61/2.15  % BW rewrite match successes           : 670
% 11.61/2.15  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 11.61/2.15  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2017601
% 11.61/2.15  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 11.61/2.15  
% 11.61/2.15  % -------------------------------------------------
% 11.61/2.15  % User time                : 1.589 s
% 11.61/2.15  % System time              : 0.073 s
% 11.61/2.15  % Total time               : 1.662 s
% 11.61/2.15  % Maximum resident set size: 3584 pages
% 11.61/2.15  
% 11.61/2.15  % -------------------------------------------------
% 11.61/2.15  % User time                : 7.827 s
% 11.61/2.15  % System time              : 0.326 s
% 11.61/2.15  % Total time               : 8.153 s
% 11.61/2.15  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 11.61/2.15  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------