↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : LCL109-3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:39:25 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.24s 3.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  30 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   30 (  29 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_wajsberg_mv_4,negated_conjecture,
    implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a)) != truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_wajsberg_mv_4) ).

cnf(lemma_10,axiom,
    implies(not(X1),not(X2)) = implies(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_10) ).

cnf(wajsberg_3,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_3) ).

cnf(lemma_9,axiom,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_9) ).

cnf(lemma_7,axiom,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)) = implies(X2,implies(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_7) ).

cnf(wajsberg_2,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_2) ).

cnf(lemma_4,axiom,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_4) ).

cnf(lemma_8,axiom,
    implies(X1,not(truth)) = not(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_8) ).

cnf(wajsberg_1,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_1) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a)) != truth,
    prove_wajsberg_mv_4 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    implies(not(X1),not(X2)) = implies(X2,X1),
    lemma_10 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    wajsberg_3 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    implies(not(implies(b,a)),not(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)))) != truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    implies(not(X1),not(implies(X2,X1))) = implies(not(X2),not(implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    lemma_9 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    implies(not(implies(a,b)),not(implies(implies(b,a),implies(a,b)))) != truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)) = implies(X2,implies(X1,X3)),
    lemma_7 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = implies(not(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    wajsberg_2 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    implies(X1,not(X2)) = implies(X2,not(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    lemma_4 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    implies(X1,not(truth)) = not(X1),
    lemma_8 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    implies(not(implies(a,b)),not(implies(a,implies(not(b),not(implies(b,a)))))) != truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),X3) = implies(X1,implies(not(X3),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),X2),implies(not(X3),implies(implies(X1,X3),not(implies(X2,not(implies(X3,X1))))))) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_13]),c_0_16]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),not(implies(not(X1),not(implies(X2,X1))))) = not(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_10]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    wajsberg_1 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    implies(a,implies(not(b),not(implies(a,implies(not(b),not(implies(b,a))))))) != truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_14]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(not(X2),not(implies(X1,implies(not(X2),not(implies(X2,X1))))))) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_10]),c_0_20]),c_0_14]),c_0_26]),c_0_16]),c_0_10]),c_0_16]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL109-3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 22:00:35 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 4.24/3.20  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 4.24/3.20  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/3.20  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/3.20  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.24/3.22  % Total time : 2.373s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------