↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL115-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:02 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 5.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  27 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   42 (  22   ~;  20   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   99 (  21 sgn  11   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(VAR_1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(VAR_0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

fof(mv_1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : is_a_theorem(implies(VAR_0,implies(VAR_1,VAR_0))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mv_1) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[mv_1]) ).

fof(mv_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1),implies(implies(VAR_1,VAR_2),implies(VAR_0,VAR_2)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mv_2) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[mv_2]) ).

fof(mv_3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1),implies(implies(VAR_1,VAR_0),VAR_0))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mv_3) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),B),implies(implies(B,A),A))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[mv_3]) ).

fof(mv_5,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(VAR_0),not(VAR_1)),implies(VAR_1,VAR_0))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mv_5) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[mv_5]) ).

fof(prove_mv_39,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(a,b)),not(b))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_mv_39) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(a,b)),not(b))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_mv_39]) ).

cnf(c_313,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(B,A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_313,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_314,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(B,C))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_314,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_315,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,A),A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,A)),C),C)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_315,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_316,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(B,C))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),implies(A,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_316,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_317,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(B,C))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_317,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_318,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(not(A),C))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_318,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_319,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(B,C))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_319,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_320,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,A),B),B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_320,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_321,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),C))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_321,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_322,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),C))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(A)),implies(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_323,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B),C),C)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_323,c_44]) ).

cnf(c_324,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(not(not(B)),C))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_324,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_325,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(B)),C))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_174,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(A)),A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_325,c_53]) ).

cnf(c_326,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(B,A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),not(B))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_186,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,not(not(A)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_326,c_174]) ).

cnf(c_327,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(B)),C))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_194,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(A)),not(not(implies(B,A))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_327,c_186]) ).

cnf(c_328,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(B,A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),not(B))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_311,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(A,B)),not(B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_328,c_194]) ).

cnf(c_312,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_311,c_6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL115-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/5.38  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:55:11 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/5.38  % Process 2933543 was started by sandbox on n018,
% 0.10/5.38  % Fri Sep 25 21:55:11 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/5.39  
% 0.10/5.39  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/5.63  
% 0.14/5.63  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/5.63  
% 0.14/5.63  % Proof 1 at 0.12 (+ 0.09) seconds.
% 0.14/5.63  % Length of proof is 23.
% 0.14/5.63  % Level of proof is 11.
% 0.14/5.63  % Maximum clause weight is 30.000.
% 0.14/5.63  % Given clauses 123.
% 0.14/5.63  
% 0.14/5.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------