↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL130-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bP0Ww0dFc3 true

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:35:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL130-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bP0Ww0dFc3 true
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 18:03:13 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.46/0.65  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.46/0.65  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.46/0.65  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.48/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.48/0.76  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.48/0.76  % BCE start: 3
% 0.48/0.76  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.48/0.76  % PE start: 3
% 0.48/0.76  logic: neq
% 0.48/0.76  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.48/0.76  % done 18 iterations in 0.021s
% 0.48/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.48/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.48/0.76  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(equivalent_type, type, equivalent: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(prove_lg_2, conjecture,
% 0.48/0.76    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.48/0.76     ( equivalent @
% 0.48/0.76       a @ 
% 0.48/0.76       ( equivalent @
% 0.48/0.76         a @ 
% 0.48/0.76         ( equivalent @
% 0.48/0.76           ( equivalent @ b @ c ) @ 
% 0.48/0.76           ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ b @ e ) @ ( equivalent @ c @ e ) ) ) ) ))).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.76    (~( is_a_theorem @
% 0.48/0.76        ( equivalent @
% 0.48/0.76          a @ 
% 0.48/0.76          ( equivalent @
% 0.48/0.76            a @ 
% 0.48/0.76            ( equivalent @
% 0.48/0.76              ( equivalent @ b @ c ) @ 
% 0.48/0.76              ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ b @ e ) @ ( equivalent @ c @ e ) ) ) ) ) )),
% 0.48/0.76    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_lg_2])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76          (equivalent @ a @ 
% 0.48/0.76           (equivalent @ a @ 
% 0.48/0.76            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ c) @ 
% 0.48/0.76             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ e) @ (equivalent @ c @ e))))))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(p_4, axiom,
% 0.48/0.76    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.48/0.76     ( equivalent @
% 0.48/0.76       ( equivalent @
% 0.48/0.76         X @ 
% 0.48/0.76         ( equivalent @
% 0.48/0.76           ( equivalent @ Y @ Z ) @ 
% 0.48/0.76           ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ Y @ U ) @ ( equivalent @ Z @ U ) ) ) ) @ 
% 0.48/0.76       X ))).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76           (equivalent @ 
% 0.48/0.76            (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 0.48/0.76             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ 
% 0.48/0.76              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3)))) @ 
% 0.48/0.76            X0))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p_4])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76           (equivalent @ 
% 0.48/0.76            (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 0.48/0.76             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ 
% 0.48/0.76              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3)))) @ 
% 0.48/0.76            X0))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p_4])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76           (equivalent @ 
% 0.48/0.76            (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 0.48/0.76             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ 
% 0.48/0.76              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3)))) @ 
% 0.48/0.76            X0))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p_4])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.48/0.76    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.48/0.76     ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.48/0.76          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.48/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76             (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 0.48/0.76              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @ 
% 0.48/0.76               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1)))))
% 0.48/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76           (equivalent @ 
% 0.48/0.76            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ 
% 0.48/0.76             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))) @ 
% 0.48/0.76            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X5 @ X4) @ 
% 0.48/0.76             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X5 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X3)))))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76             (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 0.48/0.76              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @ 
% 0.48/0.76               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1)))))
% 0.48/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X5 @ X4) @ 
% 0.48/0.76            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X5 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X3))))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.48/0.76          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.48/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1))
% 0.48/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.48/0.76          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.48/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1))
% 0.48/0.76          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0))
% 0.48/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76         ( (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X0))
% 0.48/0.76          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('eq_fact', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i]:  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76           (equivalent @ 
% 0.48/0.76            (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 0.48/0.76             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ 
% 0.48/0.76              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3)))) @ 
% 0.48/0.76            X0))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p_4])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1))
% 0.48/0.76          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0))
% 0.48/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76             (equivalent @ 
% 0.48/0.76              (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 0.48/0.76               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @ 
% 0.48/0.76                (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1)))) @ 
% 0.48/0.76              X4))
% 0.48/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X4)))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain,
% 0.48/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.76          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.48/0.76           (equivalent @ X3 @ 
% 0.48/0.76            (equivalent @ X3 @ 
% 0.48/0.76             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ 
% 0.48/0.76              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))))))),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.48/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl55, plain, ($false),
% 0.48/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl50])).
% 0.48/0.76  
% 0.48/0.76  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.48/0.76  
% 0.48/0.76  
% 0.48/0.77  % Terminating...
% 1.42/0.80  % Runner terminated.
% 1.42/0.83  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------