↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL132-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:06:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    8 (   0 equ;   1 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ~ equal(implies__dfg(x__dfg,x__dfg),truth),
    file('LCL132-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    equal(implies__dfg(truth,u),u),
    file('LCL132-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    equal(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,w),implies__dfg(u,w))),truth),
    file('LCL132-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(80,plain,
    equal(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(truth,u),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),v)),truth),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,3]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:2.0,3.0')] ).

cnf(117,plain,
    equal(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),v)),truth),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,80]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:2.0,80.0')] ).

cnf(192,plain,
    equal(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(truth,u),u),truth),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[117,2]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:117.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(220,plain,
    equal(implies__dfg(u,u),truth),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,192]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:2.0,192.0')] ).

cnf(221,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[220,1]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:220.0,1.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL132-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.07/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 20:20:27 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.49  
% 0.22/0.49  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.22/0.49  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.22/0.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.49  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.22/0.49  SPASS derived 158 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 90 clauses.
% 0.22/0.49  SPASS allocated 63465 KBytes.
% 0.22/0.49  SPASS spent	0:00:00.13 on the problem.
% 0.22/0.49  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.22/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.22/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.22/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.22/0.49  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.22/0.49  
% 0.22/0.49  
% 0.22/0.49  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 8 :
% 0.22/0.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.49  Formulae used in the proof : prove_wajsberg_lemma wajsberg_1 wajsberg_2
% 0.22/0.49  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------