%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL133-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CLtAPVapF9 true
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 01:35:16 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL133-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CLtAPVapF9 true
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Sep 5 08:09:13 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.13/0.37 % Running in FO mode
% 0.44/0.63 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.44/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.44/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.46/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.46/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.46/0.75 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.46/0.75 % BCE start: 6
% 0.46/0.75 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.46/0.75 % PE start: 6
% 0.46/0.75 logic: eq
% 0.46/0.75 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.46/0.75 % done 11 iterations in 0.023s
% 0.46/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.46/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.46/0.75 thf(y_type, type, y: $i).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(truth_type, type, truth: $i).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(prove_wajsberg_lemma, conjecture, (( x ) = ( y ))).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( x ) != ( y )),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_wajsberg_lemma])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, (((x) != (y))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(wajsberg_2, axiom,
% 0.46/0.75 (( implies @
% 0.46/0.75 ( implies @ X @ Y ) @
% 0.46/0.75 ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ) =
% 0.46/0.75 ( truth ))).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.46/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.46/0.75 ((implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 0.46/0.75 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))) = (truth))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [wajsberg_2])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(wajsberg_1, axiom, (( implies @ truth @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((implies @ truth @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [wajsberg_1])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.46/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.46/0.75 ((implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 0.46/0.75 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))) = (truth))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [wajsberg_2])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 0.46/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.46/0.75 ((implies @ (implies @ X1 @ truth) @
% 0.46/0.75 (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))) = (truth))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(lemma_antecedent, conjecture,
% 0.46/0.75 (( implies @ X @ Y ) != ( implies @ Y @ X ))).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/0.75 (( implies @ X @ Y ) = ( implies @ Y @ X )),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [lemma_antecedent])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.46/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X1 @ X0) = (implies @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((implies @ truth @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [wajsberg_1])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ truth) = (X0))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl94, plain,
% 0.46/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.46/0.75 ((implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))) = (truth))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl22, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl102, plain,
% 0.46/0.75 (![X0 : $i]: ((implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X0) @ truth) = (truth))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl94])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ truth) = (X0))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(wajsberg_3, axiom,
% 0.46/0.75 (( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ Y ) =
% 0.46/0.75 ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) @ X ))).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.46/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.46/0.75 ((implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)
% 0.46/0.75 = (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X1))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [wajsberg_3])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl53, plain,
% 0.46/0.75 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.46/0.75 ((implies @ X0 @ truth) = (implies @ (implies @ truth @ X0) @ X0))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ truth) = (X0))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((implies @ truth @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [wajsberg_1])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl67, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) = (implies @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.46/0.75 [zip_derived_cl53, zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ truth) = (X0))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl113, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) = (truth))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.46/0.75 [zip_derived_cl102, zip_derived_cl67, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl113, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) = (truth))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.46/0.75 [zip_derived_cl102, zip_derived_cl67, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl131, plain, (((truth) != (truth))),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.46/0.75 [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl113, zip_derived_cl113])).
% 0.46/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl132, plain, ($false),
% 0.46/0.75 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl131])).
% 0.46/0.75
% 0.46/0.75 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.46/0.75
% 0.46/0.75
% 0.46/0.75 % Terminating...
% 0.46/0.79 % Runner terminated.
% 0.46/0.80 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------