↑ Up

CSI_E---1.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSI_E---1.1
% Problem  : LCL152-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:20:24 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.65s 0.82s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : LCL152-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command    : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.05/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.05/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.05/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Sep  4 22:22:11 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.23/0.46  start to proof:theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/0.82  % Version  : CSI_E---1.1
% 0.65/0.82  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/0.82  % Proof found!
% 0.65/0.82  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.65/0.82  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(wajsberg_2, axiom, (implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))=truth), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax', wajsberg_2)).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(wajsberg_1, axiom, (implies(truth,X1)=X1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax', wajsberg_1)).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(wajsberg_3, axiom, (implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)=implies(implies(X2,X1),X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax', wajsberg_3)).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(wajsberg_4, axiom, (implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))=truth), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax', wajsberg_4)).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(big_hat_definition, axiom, (big_hat(X1,X2)=not(big_V(not(X1),not(X2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-1.ax', big_hat_definition)).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(big_V_definition, axiom, (big_V(X1,X2)=implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-1.ax', big_V_definition)).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(prove_wajsberg_theorem, negated_conjecture, (implies(big_hat(x,y),z)!=implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_wajsberg_theorem)).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_7, axiom, (implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))=truth), wajsberg_2).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_8, axiom, (implies(truth,X1)=X1), wajsberg_1).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_9, plain, (implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),X2))=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_10, axiom, (implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)=implies(implies(X2,X1),X1)), wajsberg_3).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_11, plain, (implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,X1),X1))=truth), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_12, plain, (implies(X1,X1)=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_13, plain, (implies(X1,truth)=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_8]), c_0_12])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_14, plain, (implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_13]), c_0_8]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_15, axiom, (implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))=truth), wajsberg_4).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_16, plain, (implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),X2)=implies(X1,X2)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_14]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_17, plain, (implies(implies(not(X1),not(truth)),X1)=truth), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_18, plain, (implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),X1)=implies(X2,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_10])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_19, plain, (implies(not(not(truth)),not(truth))=not(truth)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_20, plain, (implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3))=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_14]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_21, plain, (implies(not(truth),not(not(truth)))=not(not(truth))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), c_0_12]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_22, plain, (implies(not(truth),X1)=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_17]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_23, plain, (implies(implies(not(X1),not(implies(X2,X1))),implies(implies(X1,X2),X2))=truth), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_10])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_24, plain, (not(not(truth))=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_25, plain, (implies(not(implies(X1,not(truth))),X1)=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24]), c_0_8]), c_0_22]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_26, plain, (implies(X1,implies(not(X1),not(truth)))=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_25]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_27, axiom, (big_hat(X1,X2)=not(big_V(not(X1),not(X2)))), big_hat_definition).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_28, axiom, (big_V(X1,X2)=implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)), big_V_definition).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_29, plain, (implies(not(X1),not(truth))=X1), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_26]), c_0_8]), c_0_17]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, (implies(big_hat(x,y),z)!=implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z))), prove_wajsberg_theorem).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_31, plain, (big_hat(X1,X2)=not(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),not(X2)))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_32, plain, (implies(X1,not(truth))=not(X1)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_29]), c_0_22]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, (implies(not(implies(implies(not(x),not(y)),not(y))),z)!=implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_31])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_34, plain, (implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(not(X2),not(X1)))=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_32]), c_0_32])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_35, plain, (implies(implies(X1,not(truth)),not(truth))=X1), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_22]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, (implies(not(implies(implies(not(y),not(x)),not(x))),z)!=implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_10])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_37, plain, (implies(not(X1),not(X2))=implies(X2,X1)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_34]), c_0_8]), c_0_15]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_38, plain, (not(not(X1))=X1), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_32]), c_0_32])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, (implies(not(implies(implies(x,y),not(x))),z)!=implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36, c_0_37])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_40, plain, (implies(not(X1),X2)=implies(not(X2),X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_41, plain, (implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)),X4),implies(implies(X3,X1),X4))=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_7]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_42, plain, (implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),X3),implies(X1,X3))=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_9]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, (implies(not(z),implies(implies(x,y),not(x)))!=implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_40])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_44, plain, (implies(X1,not(X2))=implies(X2,not(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_45, plain, (implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)),implies(X2,implies(X1,X3)))=truth), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_42]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, (implies(not(z),implies(x,not(implies(x,y))))!=implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43, c_0_44])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_47, plain, (implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))=implies(X2,implies(X1,X3))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_45]), c_0_8]), c_0_45]), c_0_8])).
% 0.65/0.82  cnf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46, c_0_47]), c_0_37]), c_0_47])]), ['proof']).
% 0.65/0.82  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.65/0.82  % User time                : 0.315 s
% 0.65/0.82  % System time              : 0.023 s
% 0.65/0.82  % Total time               : 0.338 s
% 0.65/0.82  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------