↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL155-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:11:54 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 5.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  38 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   38 (  37 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(wajsberg_4,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_4) ).

cnf(or_definition,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = implies(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-2.ax',or_definition) ).

cnf(false_definition,axiom,
    not(truth) = falsehood,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL002-1.ax',false_definition) ).

cnf(wajsberg_1,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_1) ).

cnf(wajsberg_3,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_3) ).

cnf(or_commutativity,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = or(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-2.ax',or_commutativity) ).

cnf(and_definition,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-2.ax',and_definition) ).

cnf(prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom,negated_conjecture,
    xor(x,x) != falsehood,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom) ).

cnf(xor_definition,axiom,
    xor(X1,X2) = or(and(X1,not(X2)),and(not(X1),X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL002-1.ax',xor_definition) ).

cnf(and_commutativity,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = and(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-2.ax',and_commutativity) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    wajsberg_4 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = implies(not(X1),X2),
    or_definition ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    not(truth) = falsehood,
    false_definition ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    implies(or(X1,not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    wajsberg_1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    wajsberg_3 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = or(X2,X1),
    or_commutativity ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    or(truth,X1) = implies(falsehood,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    implies(or(X1,falsehood),X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,truth),truth) = implies(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    or(X1,truth) = implies(falsehood,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    implies(or(falsehood,X1),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    or(X1,not(X1)) = implies(implies(falsehood,X1),truth),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_19]),c_0_11]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    implies(implies(falsehood,falsehood),truth) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    not(falsehood) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    or(falsehood,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_24]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    or(X1,implies(X1,falsehood)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_25]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    or(X1,falsehood) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    implies(implies(falsehood,X1),truth) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_11]),c_0_27]),c_0_16]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    and_definition ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    or(X1,not(X1)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    xor(x,x) != falsehood,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,axiom,
    xor(X1,X2) = or(and(X1,not(X2)),and(not(X1),X2)),
    xor_definition ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    and(X1,not(X1)) = falsehood,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = and(X2,X1),
    and_commutativity ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    xor(x,x) != falsehood,
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    xor(X1,X1) = falsehood,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_25]),c_0_34]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL155-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/5.59  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/5.59  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/5.59  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/5.59  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/5.59  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/5.59  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/5.59  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/5.59  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:07:41 UTC 2026
% 0.13/5.59  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/5.59  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.63  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.63  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.66  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/5.66  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.66  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.66  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.66  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.66  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.66  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.66  % new_bool_3 with pid 2732233 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/5.66  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.66  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.66  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.66  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.66  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/5.66  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/5.66  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.66  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/5.66  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.66  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2732239 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/5.66  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.66  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.66  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.66  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.66  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/5.66  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/5.66  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.66  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/5.66  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.66  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.16/5.66  
% 0.16/5.66  % Proof found!
% 0.16/5.66  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/5.66  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/5.66  % Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.16/5.66  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.16/5.66  % Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.16/5.66  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.16/5.66  % Processed clauses                    : 69
% 0.16/5.66  % ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 0.16/5.66  % ...subsumed                          : 7
% 0.16/5.66  % ...remaining for further processing  : 49
% 0.16/5.66  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 0.16/5.66  % Generated clauses                    : 420
% 0.16/5.66  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 317
% 0.16/5.66  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Paramodulations                      : 420
% 0.16/5.66  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Total rewrite steps                  : 425
% 0.16/5.66  % ...of those cached                   : 276
% 0.16/5.66  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/5.66  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/5.66  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/5.66  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/5.66  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/5.66  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/5.66  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/5.66  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/5.66  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/5.66  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/5.66  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/5.66  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/5.66  % Current number of processed clauses  : 37
% 0.16/5.66  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 33
% 0.16/5.66  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.16/5.66  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.16/5.66  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 260
% 0.16/5.66  % ...number of literals in the above   : 260
% 0.16/5.66  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.16/5.66  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 59
% 0.16/5.66  % BW rewrite match successes           : 14
% 0.16/5.66  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/5.66  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4026
% 0.16/5.66  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 10
% 0.16/5.66  
% 0.16/5.66  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.66  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.16/5.66  % System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.16/5.66  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.16/5.66  % Maximum resident set size: 3592 pages
% 0.16/5.66  
% 0.16/5.66  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.66  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.16/5.66  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.16/5.66  % Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.16/5.66  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.16/5.66  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------