↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL155-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.02s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (  49 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (  48 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    9 (   9   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   0 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(wajsberg_1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : implies(truth,VAR_0) = VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_1) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    implies(truth,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[wajsberg_1]) ).

fof(wajsberg_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : implies(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1),implies(implies(VAR_1,VAR_2),implies(VAR_0,VAR_2))) = truth,
    file('theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_2) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C))) = truth,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[wajsberg_2]) ).

fof(wajsberg_3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : implies(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1) = implies(implies(VAR_1,VAR_0),VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_3) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    implies(implies(A,B),B) = implies(implies(B,A),A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[wajsberg_3]) ).

fof(wajsberg_4,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : implies(implies(not(VAR_0),not(VAR_1)),implies(VAR_1,VAR_0)) = truth,
    file('theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_4) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A)) = truth,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[wajsberg_4]) ).

fof(or_definition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : or(VAR_0,VAR_1) = implies(not(VAR_0),VAR_1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',or_definition) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    or(A,B) = implies(not(A),B),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[or_definition]) ).

fof(or_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : or(VAR_0,VAR_1) = or(VAR_1,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',or_commutativity) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    or(A,B) = or(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[or_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_79,plain,
    implies(not(A),B) = or(B,A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    implies(not(A),B) = implies(not(B),A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_79]) ).

fof(and_definition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : and(VAR_0,VAR_1) = not(or(not(VAR_0),not(VAR_1))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',and_definition) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    and(A,B) = not(or(not(A),not(B))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[and_definition]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    and(A,B) = not(implies(not(not(A)),not(B))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_10]) ).

fof(xor_definition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : xor(VAR_0,VAR_1) = or(and(VAR_0,not(VAR_1)),and(not(VAR_0),VAR_1)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',xor_definition) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    xor(A,B) = or(and(A,not(B)),and(not(A),B)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[xor_definition]) ).

cnf(c_80,plain,
    xor(A,B) = or(not(implies(not(not(A)),not(not(B)))),and(not(A),B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_81,plain,
    xor(A,B) = or(not(implies(not(not(A)),not(not(B)))),not(implies(not(not(not(A))),not(B)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_80]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    xor(A,B) = implies(not(not(implies(not(not(A)),not(not(B))))),not(implies(not(not(not(A))),not(B)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_81]) ).

fof(false_definition,axiom,
    not(truth) = falsehood,
    file('theBenchmark.p',false_definition) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    not(truth) = falsehood,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[false_definition]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    falsehood = not(truth),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_24]) ).

fof(prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom,axiom,
    xor(x,x) != falsehood,
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    xor(x,x) != falsehood,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom]) ).

cnf(c_82,plain,
    implies(not(not(implies(not(not(x)),not(not(x))))),not(implies(not(not(not(x))),not(x)))) != falsehood,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_26]) ).

cnf(c_83,plain,
    implies(not(not(implies(not(not(x)),not(not(x))))),not(implies(not(not(x)),not(not(x))))) != falsehood,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_82]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    implies(not(not(implies(not(not(x)),not(not(x))))),not(implies(not(not(x)),not(not(x))))) != not(truth),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_83]) ).

cnf(c_84,plain,
    implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),implies(truth,B))) = truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),B)) = truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_84]) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    implies(implies(not(A),B),A) = implies(implies(A,not(B)),not(B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    implies(implies(not(not(A)),B),implies(A,B)) = truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_85,plain,
    truth = implies(implies(truth,A),A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_1]) ).

cnf(c_86,plain,
    truth = implies(A,A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_85]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    implies(A,A) = truth,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_86]) ).

cnf(c_87,plain,
    implies(not(not(truth)),not(implies(not(not(x)),not(not(x))))) != not(truth),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_45,plain,
    implies(not(not(truth)),not(truth)) != not(truth),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_87]) ).

cnf(c_88,plain,
    implies(truth,A) = implies(implies(A,not(not(A))),not(not(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    A = implies(implies(A,not(not(A))),not(not(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_88]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    implies(implies(A,not(not(A))),not(not(A))) = A,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_89]) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    implies(truth,implies(A,not(not(A)))) = truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_36]) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    implies(A,not(not(A))) = truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_90]) ).

cnf(c_91,plain,
    implies(truth,not(not(A))) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_71]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    not(not(A)) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_91]) ).

cnf(c_92,plain,
    implies(truth,not(truth)) != not(truth),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_93,plain,
    not(truth) != not(truth),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_92]) ).

cnf(c_78,plain,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_93]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL155-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:56:14 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.02/0.37  % Process 3006780 was started by sandbox on n011,
% 0.02/0.37  % Fri Sep 25 21:56:14 2026
% 0.02/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.02/0.38  
% 0.02/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.02/0.41  % Length of proof is 24.
% 0.02/0.41  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.02/0.41  % Maximum clause weight is 46.000.
% 0.02/0.41  % Given clauses 25.
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------