↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LCL159-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:50:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.76s 2.82s
% Output   : Refutation 3.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  35 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (  34 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  214 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 212   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   0   ^;  66   !;   0   ?;  66   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(xor_decl,type,
    xor: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(x_decl,type,
    x: $i ).

thf(truth_decl,type,
    truth: $i ).

thf(y_decl,type,
    y: $i ).

thf(and_star_decl,type,
    and_star: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(and_decl,type,
    and: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(not_decl,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

thf(or_decl,type,
    or: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(implies_decl,type,
    implies: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(falsehood_decl,type,
    falsehood: $i ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ or ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',or_commutativity) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ or ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ xor ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ xor ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',xor_commutativity) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ xor ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ xor ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) )
      = truth ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_2) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) )
      = truth ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ or ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',or_associativity) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ or ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( truth @ implies ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_1) ).

thf(49,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( truth @ implies ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ and ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ and ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_commutativity) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ and ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ and ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) )
      = ( A @ ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_3) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) )
      = ( A @ ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( y @ ( truth @ xor ) @ ( x @ xor ) )
   != ( y @ ( truth @ ( x @ xor ) @ xor ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( ( y @ ( truth @ xor ) @ ( x @ xor ) )
   != ( y @ ( truth @ ( x @ xor ) @ xor ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ and ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ and ) @ ( A @ and ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_associativity) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ and ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ and ) @ ( A @ and ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( B @ not @ ( A @ not @ implies ) @ implies ) )
      = truth ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_4) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( B @ not @ ( A @ not @ implies ) @ implies ) )
      = truth ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ and_star ) @ and_star ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ and_star ) @ ( A @ and_star ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_star_associativity) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ and_star ) @ and_star ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ and_star ) @ ( A @ and_star ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ( ( truth @ not )
    = falsehood ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',false_definition) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ( ( truth @ not )
    = falsehood ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ xor ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ not @ and ) @ ( B @ not @ ( A @ and ) @ or ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',xor_definition) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ xor ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ not @ and ) @ ( B @ not @ ( A @ and ) @ or ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ and_star ) )
      = ( B @ not @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_star_definition) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ and_star ) )
      = ( B @ not @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ and ) )
      = ( B @ not @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_definition) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ and ) )
      = ( B @ not @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ and_star ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ and_star ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_star_commutativity) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ and_star ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ and_star ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ not @ implies ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',or_definition) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ not @ implies ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(53,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[29,41,45,27,49,39,35,18,31,43,23,51,47,37,25,21,33]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL159-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.40  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:55:56 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.68/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.08/1.27  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (261ms). 
% 1.08/1.29  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.77/1.65  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.77/1.67  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.93/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 16 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.07/1.86  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 16 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.07/1.89  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.22/1.90  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.22/1.91  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.76/2.81  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.76/2.81  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.76/2.81  % Time passed: 2211ms (effective reasoning time: 1512ms)
% 3.76/2.82  % Axioms used in derivation (16): wajsberg_3, or_definition, and_definition, xor_definition, and_commutativity, false_definition, and_associativity, or_associativity, and_star_definition, and_star_commutativity, wajsberg_4, and_star_associativity, or_commutativity, wajsberg_1, wajsberg_2, xor_commutativity
% 3.76/2.82  % No. of inferences in proof: 35
% 3.76/2.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2211 ms resp. 1512 ms w/o parsing
% 3.90/2.90  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.90/2.90  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------