↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL164-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:08 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  37 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (  36 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (  15   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : not(VAR_0) = xor(VAR_0,truth),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    not(A) = xor(A,truth),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : xor(VAR_0,falsehood) = VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    xor(A,falsehood) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : xor(VAR_0,VAR_0) = falsehood,
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    xor(A,A) = falsehood,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_3]) ).

fof(axiom_6,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : and_star(xor(truth,VAR_0),VAR_0) = falsehood,
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    and_star(xor(truth,A),A) = falsehood,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_6]) ).

fof(axiom_7,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : xor(VAR_0,xor(truth,VAR_1)) = xor(xor(VAR_0,truth),VAR_1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_7) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    xor(A,xor(truth,B)) = xor(xor(A,truth),B),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_7]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    xor(xor(A,truth),B) = xor(A,xor(truth,B)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_7]) ).

fof(xor_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : xor(VAR_0,VAR_1) = xor(VAR_1,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',xor_commutativity) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    xor(A,B) = xor(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[xor_commutativity]) ).

fof(and_star_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : and_star(VAR_0,VAR_1) = and_star(VAR_1,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',and_star_commutativity) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    and_star(A,B) = and_star(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[and_star_commutativity]) ).

fof(implies_definition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : implies(VAR_0,VAR_1) = xor(truth,and_star(VAR_0,xor(truth,VAR_1))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_definition) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    implies(A,B) = xor(truth,and_star(A,xor(truth,B))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[implies_definition]) ).

fof(prove_wajsberg_axiom,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(x),not(y)),implies(y,x)) != truth,
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_wajsberg_axiom) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    implies(implies(not(x),not(y)),implies(y,x)) != truth,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_wajsberg_axiom]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    implies(implies(xor(x,truth),not(y)),implies(y,x)) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    implies(implies(xor(truth,x),not(y)),implies(y,x)) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    implies(implies(xor(truth,x),xor(y,truth)),implies(y,x)) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    implies(implies(xor(truth,x),xor(truth,y)),implies(y,x)) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_32]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    implies(xor(truth,and_star(xor(truth,x),xor(truth,xor(truth,y)))),implies(y,x)) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    implies(xor(truth,and_star(xor(truth,x),xor(truth,xor(truth,y)))),xor(truth,and_star(y,xor(truth,x)))) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_34]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    xor(truth,and_star(xor(truth,and_star(xor(truth,x),xor(truth,xor(truth,y)))),xor(truth,xor(truth,and_star(y,xor(truth,x)))))) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    xor(truth,and_star(xor(truth,xor(truth,and_star(y,xor(truth,x)))),xor(truth,and_star(xor(truth,x),xor(truth,xor(truth,y)))))) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_36]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    and_star(A,xor(truth,A)) = falsehood,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    xor(falsehood,A) = xor(truth,xor(truth,A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    xor(falsehood,A) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    xor(truth,xor(truth,A)) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_37]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    xor(truth,and_star(and_star(y,xor(truth,x)),xor(truth,and_star(xor(truth,x),xor(truth,xor(truth,y)))))) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    xor(truth,and_star(and_star(y,xor(truth,x)),xor(truth,and_star(xor(truth,x),y)))) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_38]) ).

cnf(c_40,plain,
    xor(truth,and_star(and_star(y,xor(truth,x)),xor(truth,and_star(y,xor(truth,x))))) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_39]) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    xor(truth,falsehood) != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_40]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    truth != truth,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_42]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL164-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:56:44 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.07/0.35  % Process 2646442 was started by sandbox on n009,
% 0.07/0.35  % Fri Sep 25 21:56:44 2026
% 0.07/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.07/0.35  
% 0.07/0.35  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.07/0.36  % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.07/0.36  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.07/0.36  % Maximum clause weight is 25.000.
% 0.07/0.36  % Given clauses 7.
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------