↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL164-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.g6LYDntwyk true

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:35:19 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.19s 1.28s
% Output   : Refutation 2.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL164-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.g6LYDntwyk true
% 0.18/0.42  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.42  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 06:42:38 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.18/0.43  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.43  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.18/0.44  % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.18/0.44  % Running in FO mode
% 0.39/0.83  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.39/0.83  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.39/0.83  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.40/0.94  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.40/1.04  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.40/1.04  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.40/1.04  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.40/1.04  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.40/1.04  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.40/1.05  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 2.19/1.28  % Solved by fo/fo4.sh.
% 2.19/1.28  % done 198 iterations in 0.194s
% 2.19/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 2.19/1.28  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.19/1.28  thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(xor_type, type, xor: $i > $i > $i).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(not_type, type, not: $i > $i).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(y_type, type, y: $i).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(truth_type, type, truth: $i).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(and_star_type, type, and_star: $i > $i > $i).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(falsehood_type, type, falsehood: $i).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(prove_wajsberg_axiom, conjecture,
% 2.19/1.28    (( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ x ) @ ( not @ y ) ) @ ( implies @ y @ x ) ) =
% 2.19/1.28     ( truth ))).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 2.19/1.28    (( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ x ) @ ( not @ y ) ) @ ( implies @ y @ x ) ) !=
% 2.19/1.28     ( truth )),
% 2.19/1.28    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_wajsberg_axiom])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (((implies @ (implies @ (not @ x) @ (not @ y)) @ (implies @ y @ x))
% 2.19/1.28         != (truth))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(false_definition, axiom, (( not @ truth ) = ( falsehood ))).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, (((not @ truth) = (falsehood))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [false_definition])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(axiom_7, axiom,
% 2.19/1.28    (( xor @ X @ ( xor @ truth @ Y ) ) = ( xor @ ( xor @ X @ truth ) @ Y ))).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.19/1.28         ((xor @ X0 @ (xor @ truth @ X1)) = (xor @ (xor @ X0 @ truth) @ X1))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_7])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(xor_commutativity, axiom, (( xor @ X @ Y ) = ( xor @ Y @ X ))).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((xor @ X1 @ X0) = (xor @ X0 @ X1))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [xor_commutativity])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(axiom_1, axiom, (( not @ X ) = ( xor @ X @ truth ))).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((not @ X0) = (xor @ X0 @ truth))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((not @ X0) = (xor @ truth @ X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((not @ X0) = (xor @ X0 @ truth))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl69, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((xor @ X0 @ (not @ X1)) = (xor @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.19/1.28                [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl77, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i]: ((xor @ truth @ (not @ X0)) = (xor @ falsehood @ X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl69])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((not @ X0) = (xor @ truth @ X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((xor @ X1 @ X0) = (xor @ X0 @ X1))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [xor_commutativity])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(axiom_2, axiom, (( xor @ X @ falsehood ) = ( X ))).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((xor @ X0 @ falsehood) = (X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_2])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((xor @ falsehood @ X0) = (X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl80, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((not @ (not @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.19/1.28                [zip_derived_cl77, zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(and_star_commutativity, axiom,
% 2.19/1.28    (( and_star @ X @ Y ) = ( and_star @ Y @ X ))).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((and_star @ X1 @ X0) = (and_star @ X0 @ X1))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [and_star_commutativity])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(implies_definition, axiom,
% 2.19/1.28    (( implies @ X @ Y ) =
% 2.19/1.28     ( xor @ truth @ ( and_star @ X @ ( xor @ truth @ Y ) ) ))).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.19/1.28         ((implies @ X0 @ X1)
% 2.19/1.28           = (xor @ truth @ (and_star @ X0 @ (xor @ truth @ X1))))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((not @ X0) = (xor @ truth @ X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((not @ X0) = (xor @ truth @ X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl84, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.19/1.28         ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (not @ (and_star @ X0 @ (not @ X1))))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.19/1.28                [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl88, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.19/1.28         ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (not @ (and_star @ (not @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl84])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl84, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.19/1.28         ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (not @ (and_star @ X0 @ (not @ X1))))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.19/1.28                [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl500, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.19/1.28         ((implies @ (not @ X0) @ X1) = (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl88, zip_derived_cl84])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl532, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.19/1.28         ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (implies @ (not @ X1) @ (not @ X0)))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl80, zip_derived_cl500])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(axiom_6, axiom, (( and_star @ ( xor @ truth @ X ) @ X ) = ( falsehood ))).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i]: ((and_star @ (xor @ truth @ X0) @ X0) = (falsehood))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_6])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((not @ X0) = (xor @ truth @ X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i]: ((and_star @ (not @ X0) @ X0) = (falsehood))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl84, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.19/1.28         ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (not @ (and_star @ X0 @ (not @ X1))))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.19/1.28                [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl90, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i]: ((implies @ (not @ (not @ X0)) @ X0) = (not @ falsehood))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl29, zip_derived_cl84])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((not @ X0) = (xor @ truth @ X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((xor @ X0 @ falsehood) = (X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_2])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain, (((not @ falsehood) = (truth))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl96, plain,
% 2.19/1.28      (![X0 : $i]: ((implies @ (not @ (not @ X0)) @ X0) = (truth))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl90, zip_derived_cl28])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl80, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((not @ (not @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.19/1.28                [zip_derived_cl77, zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl210, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X0) = (truth))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl96, zip_derived_cl80])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl560, plain, (((truth) != (truth))),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.19/1.28                [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl532, zip_derived_cl210])).
% 2.19/1.28  thf(zip_derived_cl561, plain, ($false),
% 2.19/1.28      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl560])).
% 2.19/1.28  
% 2.19/1.28  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.19/1.28  
% 2.19/1.28  
% 2.19/1.28  % Terminating...
% 0.74/1.34  % Runner terminated.
% 0.74/1.36  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------