↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : LCL169-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:48:46 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 5.92s
% Output   : Proof 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   40 (  20 equ;  16 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_1_2,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(A,A),A)),
    file('LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).

cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
    implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y),
    file('LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ( ~ axiom(X)
    | theorem(X) ),
    file('LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(equality_1,axiom,
    Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0,
    theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).

cnf(equality_2,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).

cnf(equality_5,axiom,
    ( implies(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1) = implies(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1)
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(equality_6,axiom,
    ( not(Eq_x_0) = not(Eq_y_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(equality_8,axiom,
    ( theorem(Eq_y_0)
    | ~ theorem(Eq_x_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(implies(or(not(p),not(p)),not(p)))
    | implies(or(not(p),not(p)),not(p)) != implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))
    | theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[equality_8]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( not(p) != not(p)
    | or(not(p),not(p)) != implies(p,not(p))
    | implies(or(not(p),not(p)),not(p)) = implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[equality_5]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( implies(p,not(p)) != or(not(p),not(p))
    | or(not(p),not(p)) = implies(p,not(p)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    implies(p,not(p)) = or(not(p),not(p)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[implies_definition]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    ( p != p
    | not(p) = not(p) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[equality_6]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t4:3]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    p = p,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t10:2)],[equality_1]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t10:2]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(implies(or(not(p),not(p)),not(p)))
    | theorem(implies(or(not(p),not(p)),not(p))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[rule_1]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t14:1)],[t14:1,t2:3]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    axiom(implies(or(not(p),not(p)),not(p))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t14:2)],[axiom_1_2]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t16:1)],[t16:1,t14:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL169-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/5.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 14:16:51 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/5.92  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/5.92  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------