%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : LCL173-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:49:12 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.59s
% Output : Proof 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : LCL173-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.42 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.42 % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:25:01 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.59 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.23/0.59 Axiom 1 (implies_definition): implies(X, Y) = or(not(X), Y).
% 0.23/0.59 Axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.23/0.60 Axiom 3 (rule_1): ifeq(axiom(X), true, theorem(X), true) = true.
% 0.23/0.60 Axiom 4 (axiom_1_6): axiom(implies(implies(X, Y), implies(or(Z, X), or(Z, Y)))) = true.
% 0.23/0.60
% 0.23/0.60 Goal 1 (prove_this): theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))) = true.
% 0.23/0.60 Proof:
% 0.23/0.60 theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r))))
% 0.23/0.60 = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.23/0.60 ifeq(true, true, theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true)
% 0.23/0.60 = { by axiom 4 (axiom_1_6) R->L }
% 0.23/0.60 ifeq(axiom(implies(implies(q, r), implies(or(not(p), q), or(not(p), r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true)
% 0.23/0.60 = { by axiom 1 (implies_definition) R->L }
% 0.23/0.60 ifeq(axiom(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), or(not(p), r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true)
% 0.23/0.60 = { by axiom 1 (implies_definition) R->L }
% 0.23/0.60 ifeq(axiom(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true)
% 0.23/0.60 = { by axiom 3 (rule_1) }
% 0.23/0.60 true
% 0.23/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.23/0.60
% 0.23/0.60 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------