↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : LCL174-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:49:13 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.62s 0.60s
% Output   : Proof 0.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL174-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:25:34 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.62/0.60  Command-line arguments: --flatten --complete-subsets
% 0.62/0.60  
% 0.62/0.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.62/0.60  
% 0.62/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.62/0.60  Axiom 1 (implies_definition): implies(X, Y) = or(not(X), Y).
% 0.62/0.60  Axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.62/0.60  Axiom 3 (rule_1): ifeq(axiom(X), true, theorem(X), true) = true.
% 0.62/0.60  Axiom 4 (rule_2): ifeq(theorem(implies(X, Y)), true, ifeq(theorem(X), true, theorem(Y), true), true) = true.
% 0.62/0.60  Axiom 5 (axiom_1_6): axiom(implies(implies(X, Y), implies(or(Z, X), or(Z, Y)))) = true.
% 0.62/0.60  Axiom 6 (axiom_1_5): axiom(implies(or(X, or(Y, Z)), or(Y, or(X, Z)))) = true.
% 0.62/0.60  
% 0.62/0.60  Goal 1 (prove_this): theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))) = true.
% 0.62/0.60  Proof:
% 0.62/0.60    theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r))))
% 0.62/0.60  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.62/0.60    ifeq(true, true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true)
% 0.62/0.60  = { by axiom 3 (rule_1) R->L }
% 0.62/0.60    ifeq(ifeq(axiom(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true)
% 0.62/0.60  = { by axiom 1 (implies_definition) }
% 0.62/0.60    ifeq(ifeq(axiom(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), or(not(p), r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true)
% 0.62/0.60  = { by axiom 1 (implies_definition) }
% 0.62/0.60    ifeq(ifeq(axiom(implies(implies(q, r), implies(or(not(p), q), or(not(p), r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true)
% 0.62/0.60  = { by axiom 5 (axiom_1_6) }
% 0.62/0.60    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true)
% 0.62/0.60  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.62/0.60    ifeq(theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true)
% 0.62/0.60  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.62/0.60    ifeq(true, true, ifeq(theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true), true)
% 0.62/0.60  = { by axiom 3 (rule_1) R->L }
% 0.62/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(axiom(implies(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r))), implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r))))), true, theorem(implies(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r))), implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r))))), true), true, ifeq(theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true), true)
% 0.62/0.61  = { by axiom 1 (implies_definition) }
% 0.62/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(axiom(implies(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r))), or(not(implies(p, q)), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r))))), true, theorem(implies(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r))), implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r))))), true), true, ifeq(theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true), true)
% 0.62/0.61  = { by axiom 1 (implies_definition) }
% 0.62/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(axiom(implies(implies(implies(q, r), or(not(implies(p, q)), implies(p, r))), or(not(implies(p, q)), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r))))), true, theorem(implies(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r))), implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r))))), true), true, ifeq(theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true), true)
% 0.62/0.61  = { by axiom 1 (implies_definition) }
% 0.62/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(axiom(implies(implies(implies(q, r), or(not(implies(p, q)), implies(p, r))), or(not(implies(p, q)), or(not(implies(q, r)), implies(p, r))))), true, theorem(implies(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r))), implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r))))), true), true, ifeq(theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true), true)
% 0.62/0.61  = { by axiom 1 (implies_definition) }
% 0.62/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(axiom(implies(or(not(implies(q, r)), or(not(implies(p, q)), implies(p, r))), or(not(implies(p, q)), or(not(implies(q, r)), implies(p, r))))), true, theorem(implies(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r))), implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r))))), true), true, ifeq(theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true), true)
% 0.62/0.61  = { by axiom 6 (axiom_1_5) }
% 0.62/0.61    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, theorem(implies(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r))), implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r))))), true), true, ifeq(theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true), true)
% 0.62/0.61  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.62/0.61    ifeq(theorem(implies(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r))), implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r))))), true, ifeq(theorem(implies(implies(q, r), implies(implies(p, q), implies(p, r)))), true, theorem(implies(implies(p, q), implies(implies(q, r), implies(p, r)))), true), true)
% 0.62/0.61  = { by axiom 4 (rule_2) }
% 0.62/0.61    true
% 0.62/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.62/0.61  
% 0.62/0.61  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------