↑ Up

Metis---2.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : LCL176-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:42:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   34 (   0 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_1_2,axiom,
    axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)) ).

cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
    axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))) ).

cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ( theorem(X)
    | ~ axiom(X) ) ).

cnf(rule_2,axiom,
    ( theorem(X)
    | ~ axiom(or(not(Y),X))
    | ~ theorem(Y) ) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(p),p)) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X_23,X_23)),X_23)),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_1_2:[bind(A,$fot(X_23))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(not(or(X_23,X_23)),X_23))
    | ~ theorem(or(X_23,X_23))
    | theorem(X_23) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_2:[bind(X,$fot(X_23)),bind(Y,$fot(or(X_23,X_23)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X_23,X_23))
    | theorem(X_23) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( axiom(or(not(or(X_23,X_23)),X_23)) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(or(not(X_157),X_157),or(not(X_157),X_157)))
    | theorem(or(not(X_157),X_157)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_2:[bind(X_23,$fot(or(not(X_157),X_157)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(not(X_3),or(X_4,X_3)))
    | theorem(or(not(X_3),or(X_4,X_3))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_1:[bind(X,$fot(or(not(X_3),or(X_4,X_3))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    axiom(or(not(X_3),or(X_4,X_3))),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_1_3:[bind(A,$fot(X_3)),bind(B,$fot(X_4))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X_3),or(X_4,X_3))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( axiom(or(not(X_3),or(X_4,X_3))) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X_155),or(X_154,X_155))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_6:[bind(X_3,$fot(X_155)),bind(X_4,$fot(X_154))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C))))
    | ~ theorem(or(A,or(B,C)))
    | theorem(or(B,or(A,C))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_2:[bind(X,$fot(or(B,or(A,C)))),bind(Y,$fot(or(A,or(B,C))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(A,or(B,C)))
    | theorem(or(B,or(A,C))) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))) )],[axiom_1_5,refute_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X_155),or(X_154,X_155)))
    | theorem(or(X_154,or(not(X_155),X_155))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(A,$fot(not(X_155))),bind(B,$fot(X_154)),bind(C,$fot(X_155))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    theorem(or(X_154,or(not(X_155),X_155))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( theorem(or(not(X_155),or(X_154,X_155))) )],[refute_0_7,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    theorem(or(or(not(X_157),X_157),or(not(X_157),X_157))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(X_154,$fot(or(not(X_157),X_157))),bind(X_155,$fot(X_157))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X_157),X_157)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( theorem(or(or(not(X_157),X_157),or(not(X_157),X_157))) )],[refute_0_12,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    theorem(or(not(p),p)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_13:[bind(X_157,$fot(p))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( theorem(or(not(p),p)) )],[refute_0_14,prove_this]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL176-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 22:14:55 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.11/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.40  
% 0.11/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------